Page 260 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 260

236   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION   PSA PROCESSES                       237

 I        as  reformer off gas.  For most  applications a  high-pur:ity  hydrogen  product is
          reamred  (at least  99.99%  and  often  99.999%).  Since  hydrogen  1s  adsorbed
          much  less  strongly  than  almost  any  other  species,  a well-designed  pressure
 S1cp   i   swmg  system  can  meet  this  challenge.  Indeed  this  1s  one  application  for
 ~
 •   A   B   C   D   which PSA has  a clear advantage over almost  all  other possible  approaches,
 '
 a
 C   <    for  many of which  these punty levels are  unattamable.
 0"   A-I   C   I
 u .":'.
 _,   ,     Commercial  1mpiementation  of  PSA  processes  for  hydrogen  recovery
 E
 0  C
 u
 ~"   0   I   dates from the late 1960s, but the earlier processes were small-scaie three- or
 u,
 C,
 ·"   T Feed   t Vac.   .E   four-bed  umts  with  relatively  modest  perfonnance  ( ~ 70%  recovery)  de-
 "-
 2-3   C
 C
 ,
 ·2   "E.
 08                         Adsorbem           SA zeolite
 •   ~    Table 6.2.  Details of Test Conditions and Performance Data for a ·Four-Bed Hydrogen
 <
 0  C   ~          PSA Purification System
 A-2   A   D
                            Size
                                               i-4 mm  (4-18 mesh)
                            Form               spherical beads
 I Vac.   1  Blow
                            Bulk density       0.74kg/l
                            Feed cone.
                             H,                69.2vol%
                             N,                26.8
                             co                2.2
 "                           CH,               1.8
 A   C   D
                            Pressure
                             Adsorption  Pa    8.6 kg/cm  2
 Vac.                        Purge PP          I.5 kg/cm 2
                             First equilibration  P  1   5.2 kg/cm 2
                             Second equilibration  P,,   1.9 kg/cm 2
 Al   A2   Bl   B2   Cl   C2   DI   D2
           Run no.               2    3    4    5   6    7   8    9    IO   11
 J
 i
 ]   .   i   Feed rate (Nljmin)a  14.9   14.6   14.6   21.0   20.9  20.9   8.3   8.3   14.6   14.6   14.5
                                                                           8.0
           Cyde Time {min)
                          12.0
                                                                      6.0
                                                                 47
                                     48.0
                                24.0
 ,
 ~  2   ---t-------r--  Column size   4.3 cm 1.d. x  200 cm L.   8.4   16.8  33.6  21.0  42.0   4.3 cm 1.d. x  100 cm L.
 .!::<
           Adsorbent (kg)    2.06  X 4 bed                          1.0  x  4bed
 •  C
 ~ E       Product cone.
 iP   '  '   H (vol%)     99.73   85.61   76.19  99.38  84.22  76.55,  99.93  83.48  99.87  97.93  88.41
 "  C
 '
 ~v   '     N,  2          0.27   13.41   21.15   0.62  14.52  20.86   0.07  15.19   0.13   2.06  10.9
 '
 '  I   '   I   co         0.0   0.52   1.48   0.0   0.68   t.45   0.0   0.68   0.0   0.0   0.39
 !
 ___ .J _______ J.._Q_ I ala
                           0.0   0.47   1.18   0.0   0.58   1.14   0.0   0.65   0.0   O.Ql   0.30
 0   2   4   CH 4
           H  Recovery(%)   77.7   88.4   94.9   77.2  90.3   94.6  77.7   90.5   70.0   78.6   83.9
 Time  (mm.)   2
           Adsorbent
 Figure 6.12  Sequence of bed switching and pressure variation  in  a  four-bed  hydro-  productivitv   21.7   42.7   84.9   21.4   42.6  85.2  21.3   42.5   17.0   21.8   29.0
 gen  PSA process. (From Suzuki, 29   with permission.)   Q (NI/kg ads.,
            cvcle)
           Space veiocilV
            0/mm)          0.66   0.63   0.62   0.90  0.87  0.84   0.37  0.37   1.30   1.29   i.26
            NI = liters at 273  K I atm.
                       23
           From Tomita et al.,  with  perm1ss1on.
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265