Page 263 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 263

240                                   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION                   R•acior  A   Adr.orplion   ::,~::: - !Cl,,!.':~"'' -  P11r911   ,.,,.,.
                                                                                                                                               c , •• ,. - ) .. .,.,.. .. ..,.,-
                                                                                                         c.,,,.,._  /0.,.,0 ..... ,-                  ,.1,_
                                                                                              R•11ctor  B   ,,,_   ,.,_   P1.1rg11   ~:;::~ - I"'~:.' .. "" -  Ad•otpt,on
            shown  m Figure 6.12.  Details concernmg the optimization have been given by      R1usctor  C    Purr,•   f:~ - 1"'-r.::: .. "'•·   Adr.orpfJ011   !::-.:~ - 1-:;;:::·
            Doshi  et  al. 22   Results  of an  expenmental  pilot  scale  study  of the  four-bed   R,vctor  D  - ::~=~·- /"•::.;:::-··   Adr.orplion   !::::~· - 10·::::: .. '""•·   , P11rge
                                                              23
             hydrogen  PSA process  have  been reported  by Tomita et al.  Some of thetr
                                                                                                                           /a)
             results are presented m Table 6.2 and Figure 6.13.
               A  d.etailed  theoret1cal opt1m1zat1on of the design of a zeolite-based hydro-
             gen  PSA  unit~  for  feed  and  oroduct  specifications  typical  of  industrial
             practice.  has  been  earned  out  by  Smith  and  Westerberg.  30   Their  results                                            ZI
             illustrate clearly  the  economy obtained from  an optimal choice of operatmg
             pressures  and  the  number of equalization steps.  For smaller-scale  plants  a
             smgie  eaualization  step  1s  preferable,  but  as  the  throughput  mcreases  the
             ootimum  shifts  towards  two  or  three  equalization  steos  as  a  result  of  the
             proportionately  greater  importance  of  operating  versus  caoital  costs  (see   8
             Figure  1.3). The oot1mal operatmg pressure, for  a system with two  eoualiza-                                                             I
             tions,  is  about 18  atm. These conclus1ons  are in  line with current 1ndustnal
                                                                                                                                           F3J
             practice.
                                                                                             C
               6.5.2  Polybed Process
             The  oolybed  process  operates  on  a  similar  prmciple  but with  seven  to  ten
             beds  and  at  least  three  pressure  equalization  steps.  This  mcreases  the
             hydrogen  recovery  to  the  85-90%  range,  but  the  improvement  m  perfor-  D
            ' mance  must  be  weighed  against  the  increase  in  capital  cost.  The  process                                                        I
             flowsheet  1s  shown  in  Figure  6.14.  Both  four-bed  and  polybed  processes
             operate  typically  with  a  pressure  ratio 20-30 atm/1  aim. The overall  mass        '------''.l::::'.... ____ ..'.f'.:'::'."''_ __ -~·i~·----' ----~''r ... ,
                                                                                                                 Joo....
                                                                                                                              ,  ,
              balance 1s  shown  m Figure 6.15.  Purities as high as 99.9999% are achievable
                                                                                                                           (b)
             with the polybed system,  although 99.999%  1s  more common.



                  Feed
                  Reformer  Off-Gas                            Hydrogen  Product
                  20  at1110spheres                            19  atmospheres
                  .i  Hole                                     0.66  mole
                  H  77%                                      H 99.99t
                                                               2
                  co,  22.5%
                  CO+CH 4  0.5%
                                             l



                                       Waste  Produce
                                       .1  atmosphere
                                        o.34  moles                                                                       (c)
                                          H 32%
                                          2
                                         co  67%
                                        CO+~H,  1%                                         Figure 6.-16  Switching seauence, pressure history,  and schematic flowsheet  for four-
                                                                                           bed  carbon  molecular  sieve  hydrogen  purification  process.  (From  Pilarczvk  and
                                                                                                   13
                                                                                           Knoblauch,  with  oenmss10n.)
               Figure 6.15  Mass  balance for oolybed PSA  hydrogen purification orocess.
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268