Page 332 - Pressure Swing Adsorption
P. 332

308   PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
           APPENDIX A
                                                                        309
 denvatrves,  as  follows.
           present,  which  1moiies  that  1t  mav  be  a  ma1or  constituent  and  that  the
 \H   ~I    adsorbent may have substantial caoac1tv.  In  these equations. pressure drop m
 aw   ldw   the  adsorbent  bed  1s  assumed  to  be  negligihle.  The  resulting  equalities.
 ill   IF  GI   (A.3)   corresponding to the first  two of Eq.  A.5  arc:
 dt   dz.   I
                         {3 AIJ
 /F   !.I       dz  - ~-'-"--- dt
                   - I  + ( {3  - I) y,
 aw   ldt   I
 Tz'   (A.4)   t                                                      (A.6)
 I :i  Yzl   i   dy.  =  (/3  - 1)(1  - Y,)Y,  d In  P

 Numencal  values  could  be  found  from  Eqs.  A.3  and  A.4  for  these  partial   '   1+({3-l)y,   dt
    i
 denvativcs,  but they are not especially useful m this context.  Ironically, thetr
 soiutmn  becomes  meaningless  when  the  denominator  vanishes,  though  the   These are eomvaJent to Eus. 4.7 and 4.8,  and they are called  charactertstlc
 numerator must  also vanish  for  the  quotient to remam finite.  That property   eauat10ns.  The  former  defines  characteristic  traJectories  aiong  the  hed  axts
 yields  expressions  among  the  coefficients  that  must  be  valid  even  though   j   with  respect  to  time.  The latter.  which  must  be  soived  stmultaneously  with
 values of the oarttai ctenvatives cannot be detenmned. The following must all   the  former,  defines  the  composition vanation  along each  traJectorv (e.g.,  as
 be  true:   pressure varies). Although characteristics may appear to be arbitrary lines or
           curves, they are not. At each position and time there 1s  only one correspond-
 Fdz  - Gdt   (A.5)
           ing  charactenstic.  Physically,  this  1s  reasonable,  because  that  means  that
 Fdw - Hdt   there can only be a  smgle composition  at  any point and  time.
 Hdz - Gdw    By  their nature,  however, charactenstics that  represent different composi-
 Most  useful  applicattons  of  pressure  swmg  adsorption  have  auasilinear   tions  have  different  slopes.  Generally,  those  havmg  greater amounts  of the
 matenal balance equations, due to  the  dependence of both velocity and  the   more strongly adsorbed  comoonent  have  larger slopes,  as shown  m Ea.  A.6.
 adsorption  isotherm  on  partial  pressure.  In fact,  Eq.  A.1  1s  eau1valent  to  a   Thus when the influent contams more of the more strongly adsorbed compo-
 continuity  equation  of  component  t  for  a  binary  mixture  in  a  fixed  bed.   nent  than  the  initial  column  contents,  the  charactenst1cs  of  the  influent
 Furthermore. the approoriate form can be denvect from  Ea.  4.4,  by  applying   would  tend  to  ovcriap  those  of  the  initial  contents.  That,  as  'ment1oned,,
 the chain  rule for  differentiation  with  some  algebraic mamouiatio·.1.  Soecifi-  would be 1mpossible. The conflict cannot be  resolved by merely averagmg the
 cally,  that  equation  is  obtained  from  two  independent  equations:  the  first   compositions or blending the  equations.  Rather, an overall  material  balance
 being  for  component  1  (or  2),  and  the  second  representmg  the  sum  of   is  performed,  looking  at  the  sliver  of  adsorbent  mto  which  passes  the
 comoonents I  and 2.   high-concentration  materiai,  and  out  of which  flows  the  low-concentration
 In the resultmg equation, w 1s taken to be the mole fract10n of comoonent   matenal.  In  fact,  11  may  be  helpful  to  visualize  the  composition  shift  that
 ,, ancl  F  is  adjusted to unity. In so clomg, G  describes the conveyance due to   occurs both m terms of position and time. The first  illustration, Figure A. l(a)
 bulk motion through the fixed  beet and the distribution between the fluid  anct   shows composition profiles at three instants of time,_ one of which catches the
 solid  phases.  while  H  relates  the  nature  of a  composition  shift  that  corre-  front  m  the  region  of mterest.  The  second,  Figure  A.J(b),  shows  identical
 sponds to a pressure shift and includes the distribution between the fluid  and   data,  but  in  the form  of internal breakthrough curves (i.e.,  histoiies  at  three
 solid phases. The symbolic definitions are:   axial  positions). The shapes of the  curves do  not  matter (as  iong as  they are
           not  spreading);  all  that  matters  ts  the  composition  shift.  The  fronts  1ri  the
 G  -  {3Au
 I  + ({3  - 1) Y;   illustratmn are sketched as rounded, though-the cquilibnum theory considers
           them to be step changes.
 (/3  - 1)(1  - Y;)Y;  d In  P   The key concept explainmg the  movement of the  front  is  that there  is  no
 Ii  -
 I  + (/3  - l)y 1   di   accu,mulation at  the  front  itself. This 1s  equivalent  to saymg  that  the adsorb-
 Even  for  linear  isotherms  (where  {3,  = (1  + [(I  - e)je]k,)-•,  and  {3  =   ent  m  the  bed  is  uniform,  or  that  the  isotherms  are  independent  of ax.iai
           Position.  Following  the  sketches,  1t  is  most  useful  ;to  consider  elements  of
 {3 Al {3  8 ), the mterstitial fluid velocity depends on  the amount ·of component ,
           soace  and  time (e.g.,  a  sliver of adsorbent  and  a  moment of time).  For that
   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337