Page 338 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 338

Electrokinetic Flow                 325

          Ths now defines the mode wcu and wcv and dependent variables Imu and lmv.
          We  could  do  this  slightly tidier  with  one  weak boundary constraint with two
          variables.  Back in the FEMLAB  GUI main  window, select Boundary Mode
          and Boundary Settings for mode wcu and then mode wcv.

                   Boundary Mode and Boundary Settings
                          Mode wcu.  Select domain 2 and 3, check
                          active in this subdomain, type ‘u’ into the
                          constraint variable entry box, and Apply
                          Mode wcv.  Select domain 2 and 3, check
                          active in this subdomain, type ‘v’ into the
                          constraint variable entry box, and Apply
                          OK
          NOW it  is  safe  to  click  on  the  Solve  (=)  toolbar  button.  It  still  takes  some
          substantial time to make progress in this model - the coupling does not help the
          sparseness of the matrix assembled - but timestepping does proceed to solution
          in  7  minutes.  A  Pentium I11  866Hz produced  the first  output time  step in 4
          minutes.
          Figure  9.3  shows  all  the  information  rolled  up  into  one  plot  for  the  final
          time  t=l.  By  this  time,  all  streamlines  are  parallel  and  velocity  vectors
          uniform  - flat  profile.  The  spreading  of  concentration  and  speeding  up  of
          the  flow are all  driven by  the electric field,  which is  now  apparently uniform
          in  magnitude.  A  few  cross plots  (see Figure 9.4)  show that  the  steady  state
          electric  field  relaxes  its  transients  within  the  first  output  time  and  remains
          constant  thereafter  (phi  is  linear  for  all  times  after  t=0.1).  As  expected,
          electrokmetic  flow  is  dragged  along  by  its  boundary  layer  coupling  to  the
          electric field.
             But why did this recipe work?  Of course we tried everything we could think
          of.  For  instance,  we  tried  adding  an  additional  time  dependence  in  the
          electrostatic  potential  equation,  da=0.001,  as  an  attempt  to  overcome  the
          stiffness of instantaneous relaxation to  electrostatic equilibrium.  But the final
          result uses weak boundary conditions for the side wall Navier-Stokes velocities
          which  are  linearly coupled  to  the  electric  field, but  not  for  the  outlet  species
          condition which is nonlinearly coupled to concentration and electric field.  We
          tried some variations on the species mode:
          Trial 1 : No weak boundary constraint (general form) - apparently fine
          Trial 2: Weak boundary constraint (general form) - does not work
          Trial 3: Weak boundary constraint (weak form) - does not work
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343