Page 101 -
P. 101

4.6  Assumptions of T tests and F tests  87




                  is  a  significant  difference  among  the  three  text  entry  methods  (F(2,  28) = 5.702,
                  p < 0.01). The interaction effect between task types and text entry methods is not
                  significant (F(2, 28) = 0.037, n.s.).

                   Table 4.18  Results of the Split-Plot Test for the Between-Group Variable
                   Source     Sum of Square  df   Mean Square  F          Significance
                   Task type  2745.187        1   2745.187     0.995      0.335
                   Error      38,625.125    14    2758.937


                   Table 4.19  Results of the Split-Plot Test for the Within-Group Variable
                                      Sum of           Mean
                   Source             Square     df    Square     F       Significance

                   Entry method       17,564.625    2  8782.313   5.702   0.008
                   Entry method*task type  114.875    2  57.437   0.037   0.963
                   Error (entry method)  43,126.5  28  1540.232



                  4.6  ASSUMPTIONS OF T TESTS AND F TESTS

                  Before running a t test or an F test, it is important to examine whether your data
                  meet the assumptions of the two tests. If the assumptions are not met, you may make
                  incorrect inferences from those tests. Both t tests and F tests typically require three
                  assumptions for the data:
                     First, the errors of all data points should be independent of each other. If they are
                  not independent of each other, the result of the test can be misleading (Snedecor and
                  Cochran, 1989). For example, in the text-entry method study, if two investigators
                  conducted the study and one investigator consistently gave the participants more
                  detailed instructions than the other investigator, the participants who completed the
                  study with more detailed instructions might perform consistently better than those
                  who received less detailed instructions. In this case, the errors of the participants
                  who were instructed by the same investigator are no longer independent and the test
                  results would be spurious.
                     Second, the errors in the data need to be identically distributed. This assumption
                  is also called “homogeneity of variance.” When multiple group means are compared,
                  the t test or the F test is more accurate if the variances of the sample population are
                  nearly equal. This assumption does not mean that we can only run t tests or F tests
                  when the variances in the populations are exactly the same. Actually, we only be-
                  come concerned when the population variances are very different or when the two
                  sample sizes are very different (Rosenthal and Rosnow, 2008). In cases when this
                  assumption is violated, you can use transformation techniques, such as square roots,
                  logs, and the reciprocals of the original data (Hamilton, 1990), to make the variances
                  in the sample population nearly equal.
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106