Page 322 - Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design
P. 322

bud29281_ch06_265-357.qxd  12/7/09  7:25PM  Page 297 ntt 203:MHDQ196:bud29281:0073529281:bud29281_pagefiles:







                                                                               Fatigue Failure Resulting from Variable Loading  297
                                    Solution   From Fig. A–15–9, using D/d = 38/32 = 1.1875, r/d = 3/32 = 0.093 75, we read
                                                                .
                                               the graph to find K t = 1.65.
                                                                                             .
                                               (a) From Fig. 6–20, for S ut = 690 MPa and r = 3 mm, q = 0.84. Thus, from Eq. (6–32)
                                                                               .
                                     Answer                  K f = 1 + q(K t − 1) = 1 + 0.84(1.65 − 1) = 1.55
                                                                                          √          √         √
                                               (b) From Eq. (6–35a) with S ut = 690 MPa = 100 kpsi,  a = 0.0622 in = 0.313 mm.
                                               Substituting this into Eq. (6–33) with r = 3 mm gives

                                                                         K t − 1  .    1.65 − 1
                                     Answer                   K f = 1 +    √    = 1 +          = 1.55
                                                                       1 +  a/r           0.313
                                                                                      1 + √
                                                                                            3




                                                  Some designers use 1/K f as a Marin factor to reduce S e. For simple loading, infi-
                                               nite life problems, it makes no difference whether S e is reduced by dividing it by K f or
                                               the nominal stress is multiplied by K f. However, for finite life, since the S-N diagram
                                               is nonlinear, the two approaches yield differing results.  There is no clear evidence
                                               pointing to which method is better. Furthermore, in Sec. 6–14, when we consider com-
                                               bining loads, there generally are multiple fatigue stress-concentration factors occurring
                                               at a point (e.g. K f for bending and K fs for torsion). Here, it is only practical to modify
                                               the nominal stresses. To be consistent in this text, we will exclusively use the fatigue
                                               stress-concentration factor as a multiplier of the nominal stress.




                             EXAMPLE 6–7       For the step-shaft of Ex. 6–6, it is determined that the fully corrected endurance limit is
                                               S e = 280 MPa. Consider the shaft undergoes a fully reversing nominal stress in the fil-
                                               let of (σ rev ) nom = 260 MPa. Estimate the number of cycles to failure.

                                    Solution   From Ex. 6–6, K f = 1.55, and the ultimate strength is S ut = 690 MPa = 100 kpsi. The
                                               maximum reversing stress is

                                                              (σ rev ) max = K f (σ rev ) nom = 1.55(260) = 403 MPa
                                               From Fig. 6–18, f = 0.845. From Eqs. (6–14), (6–15), and (6–16)
                                                               ( fS ut ) 2  [0.845(690)] 2
                                                           a =        =              = 1214 MPa
                                                                  S e        280
                                                                 1   fS ut    1     0.845(690)
                                                           b =− log       =− log              =−0.1062
                                                                 3    S e     3       280

                                                                                 1/−0.1062

                                                                     1/b

                                                                            403
                                     Answer                 N =  σ rev  =              = 32.3 10 3 	  cycles

                                                                  a        1214
                                                  Up to this point, examples illustrated each factor in Marin’s equation and stress
                                               concentrations alone. Let us consider a number of factors occurring simultaneously.
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327