Page 285 - Soil and water contamination, 2nd edition
P. 285

272                                                  Soil and Water Contamination

                    Internal functions
                                                                                          -1
                                                                                        -3
                    F      = resuspension  rate                                     [M.L .T ]
                     r
                                                                                        -3
                                                                                          -1
                    F      = settling rate                                          [M.L .T ]
                     s
                                                                                          -3
                    O sat  = dissolved oxygen  saturation concentration               [M.L ]
                     2
                                                                                          -1
                    U      = mean flow velocity                                        [L.T ]
                     x
                    z     = water depth                                                  [L]
                    Figure 15.2b  (continued) Nomenclature for Figure 15.2a (Van der Perk, 1998)
                    complex at first glance, they always remain simplified mathematical representations of the
                    real world.
                       The construction of complex environmental models usually proceeds in stages .  The
                    first step is to propose a mathematical model, based on a combination of theoretical and
                    empirical considerations and heuristics. The next step is to determine and check whether
                    the mathematical model is a faithful representation of the conceptual model. If applicable,
                    this step also involves a test to check if the numerical implementation of the mathematical
                    model is a faithful representation of the mathematical model. This procedure is called model
                    verification , which denotes the establishment of truth. Model verification is only possible
                    for the mathematical steps in the model construction.
                       In Section 10.2 we saw that besides the set of mathematical equations, it is also necessary
                    to input variables and parameters in the model, to perform mathematical modelling . The
                    values of the model input variables, for instance time series of mass discharge inputs and
                    water temperature, or digital maps of aquifer properties, are usually based on field data but
                    may also be hypothetical. The values of the model parameters, such as for example rate
                    constant or equilibrium coefficients, are usually chosen initially from laboratory studies or
                    the literature. Often, these values of the model parameters must be adjusted to improve the
                    model results to a satisfactory level. To evaluate whether the model results are satisfactory,
                    a data set of experimental or field observations of the model’s state variables is needed. In
                    addition, some criteria are needed against which the model’s performance can be evaluated.
                    If the model results correspond favourably with the observations, then the model is accepted;
                    if they do not, the model parameters should be further adjusted to fit the observations better.
                    This procedure of tuning the model parameters is called model calibration .
                       If the model has been calibrated, i.e. the errors are within an acceptable range, the model
                    is often tested using a second, independent, data set of experimental or field observations:
                    for example, observations from another year or a different site. At this stage, the model
                    parameters are not adjusted any more. This procedure, called model  validation , provides
                    reassurance that the model is performing adequately and fulfils the purpose for which it
                    was constructed. In this case too, prescribed criteria are needed so it can be decided whether
                    to accept or reject the model. If the model fails to reproduce the observed values within
                    acceptable limits, the model must be redesigned and the procedure of model calibration
                    described above should be repeated.
                       A verified, calibrated, and validated model does not necessarily imply that the model
                    includes all major processes and that that the processes are formulated correctly. Real-world
                    systems are intractable and the processes governing the transport and fate of chemicals
                    in the environment usually depend on more factors than the models account for, but the
                    degree of influence of those factors is often obscure. For example, most models used in river
                    water quality management that account for the sinks and sources of dissolved oxygen  and
                    the nitrogen  and phosphorus  cycles, do not take account of the adverse effects of accidental
                    toxin discharges on biochemical transformation  rates. These models may perform well under
                    regular conditions but are not intended to predict water quality after accidents. In other
                    words, these models have not been validated for circumstances in which accidental toxin










                                                                                            10/1/2013   6:45:21 PM
        Soil and Water.indd   284                                                           10/1/2013   6:45:21 PM
        Soil and Water.indd   284
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290