Page 214 - Statistics for Environmental Engineers
P. 214

L1592_frame_C24.fm  Page 215  Tuesday, December 18, 2001  2:45 PM









                       24




                       Analysis of Variance to Compare k Averages






                       KEY WORDS ANOVA, ANOVA table, analysis of variance, average, between treatment variance, grand
                       average, F test, F distribution, one-way ANOVA, sum of squares, within-treatment variance.

                       Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a method for testing two or more treatments to determine whether
                       their sample means could have been obtained from populations with the same true mean. This is done
                       by estimating the amount of  variation within treatments and comparing it to the  variance between
                       treatments. If the treatments are alike (from populations with the same mean), the variation within each
                       treatment will be about the same as the  variation between treatments. If the treatments come from
                       populations with different means, the variance between treatments will be inflated. The “within vari-
                       ance” and the “between variance” are compared using the F statistic, which is a measure of the variability
                       in estimated variances in the same way that the t statistic is a measure of the variability in estimated
                       means.
                        Analysis of variance is a rich and widely used field of statistics. “…the analysis of variance is more
                       than a technique for statistical analysis. Once understood, analysis of variance provides an insight into
                       the nature of variation of natural events, into Nature in short, which is possibly of even greater value
                       than the knowledge of the method as such. If one can speak of beauty in a statistical method, analysis
                       of variance possesses it more than any other” (Sokal and Rohlf, 1969).
                        Naturally, full treatment of such a powerful subject has been the subject of entire books and only a
                       brief introduction will be attempted here. We seek to illustrate the key ideas of the method and to show
                       it as an alternative to the multiple paired comparisons that were discussed in Chapter 20.



                       Case Study: Comparison of Five Laboratories

                       The data shown in Table 24.1 (and in Table 20.1) were obtained by dividing a large quantity of prepared
                       material into 50 identical aliquots and having  five different laboratories each analyze 10 randomly
                       selected specimens. By design of the experiment there is no real difference in specimen concentrations,
                       but the laboratories have produced different mean values and different variances. In Chapter 20 these
                       data were analyzed using a multiple t-test to compare the mean levels. Here we will use a one-way
                       ANOVA, which focuses on comparing the variation within laboratories with the variation between
                       laboratories. The analysis is one-way because there is one factor (laboratories) to be assessed.




                       One-Way Analysis of Variance
                       Consider an experiment that has k treatments (techniques, methods, etc.) with n t  replicate observations
                       made under each treatment, giving a total of N = ∑kn t  observations, where t = 1, 2,…,k. If the variation
                       within each treatment is due only to random measurement error, this within-treatment variance is a good
                       estimate of the pure random experimental error. If the k treatments are different, the variation between
                       the k treatments will be greater than might be expected in light of the variation that occurs within the
                       treatment.



                       © 2002 By CRC Press LLC
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219