Page 186 - Steam Turbines Design, Applications, and Rerating
P. 186

Chapter
                                                              10








                       Rotor Dynamics Technology













            Rotor dynamics analysis began in the 1870s when efforts were made to
            calculate the fundamental natural frequencies of shafts. Fifty years
            later the effects of an unbalanced force on the response of a single
            rotating disk were considered. For 25 more years, until 1944, analyses
            were limited to simple rotors, or to graphical solutions, for the deter-
            mination of fundamental frequencies. At that time, M. A. Prohl of the
            General Electric Company developed a general calculation method
            that could be applied to any rotor geometry for the determination of
            many frequencies. This was a key breakthrough for rotor analysis and
            constitutes the basis for the present-day representation of rotors.


            10.1 Rotor Model
            Prohl’s method enabled the analyst to represent the rotor by a mathe-
            matical model that closely resembled the actual geometry. There was
            no longer any need for the simplifying assumptions required in previ-
            ous calculated and graphical solutions. In addition, the second and
            higher mode frequencies and mode shapes could be obtained as readily
            as the first.
              The method divided the rotor into a series of finite elements consist-
            ing of concentrated masses connected by massless springs. In current
            practice, mass stations are established at virtually every rotor location
            where there is a change in shaft diameter and at the wheel, thrust
            collar, coupling, and bearing locations as shown in Fig. 10.1. This is a
            high-speed rotor that has a total of 48 mass stations. The bearing cen-
            terlines are at stations 5 and 45.
              The resulting mathematical model has the same mass and stiffness
            distribution as the actual rotor. Refinements are included such as the
            effective stiffnesses of the shaft sections through the integral wheels
                                                                          165
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191