Page 260 - Sustainability in the Process Industry Integration and Optimization
P. 260

E x a m p l e s  a n d Ca s e  S t u d i e s   237


                 Stream  Type  T  [°C]  T  [°C]  m   C    ΔH     CP      ΔH
                                s     t            p        vap
                                            [kg/s] [kJ/kg·°C] [kJ/kg]  [kW/°C] [kW]
                 F1-liq  Cold    50   120   1      11        —    11       770
                 F1-evap  Сold  120   120   1       —       990    —       990
                 F1-vap  Сold   120   180   1       4.5      —     4.5     270
                 F2-liq  Cold    50   125   0.8    15        —    12       900
                 F2-evap  Cold  125   125   0.8     —      1250    —      1000
                 F2-vap  Cold   125   180   0.8     7.5      —     6       330
                 HM      Cold   220   250   1.4     25       —    35      1050
                 CA      Hot    120   120    —      —        —     —       900
                 RA      Cold   220   220    —      —        —     —      1000
                 FR      Cold   120   180   0.4     5        —     2       120
                 CB      Hot    200   200    —      —        —     —       980
                 RB      Cold   270   270    —      —        —     —      1928
                 P1-cond  Hot   270   270   0.5     —      1556    —       778
                 P1-liq  Hot    270    70   0.5    37.17     —    18.58   3716
                 P2      Hot    200    70   0.8    12.5      —    10      1300


                TABLE 10.14  Stream Data for Pinch Analysis [Problem 5(a)].


                       Answer to (d)(1). Using the GCC in Figure 10.19, from the viewpoint of a heat
                       pump, two good candidates for its integration are as follows:
                         •  Across the Process Pinch. Heat rejection from the heat pump to the
                            process  T* = 230°C (real temperature T = 240°C) and heat absorption
                            from the process at T* = 190°C (T = 180°C), would result in temperature
                            lift ΔT  = 60°C. The main challenge is that the heat available for
                                lift
                            absorption by the heat pump is relatively smaller than what can be
                            delivered by the heat pump above the Process Pinch.
                         •  Across a potential Utility Pinch. Heat rejection level  T* = 130°C and
                            absorbtion heat level  T* = 110°C. The corresponding real heat pump
                            temperatures are: heat rejection level  T = 140°C and heat absorption
                            level,  T = 100°C. This results in temperature lift ΔT  = 40°C. At this
                                                                  lift
                            level, a large amount of heat is available to be absorbed from the process
                            and an even larger amount can be rejected to the process.
                       Answer to (d)(2).
                         •  From the GCC, the heat pump integration can be placed at the levels of
                            140°C and 100°C with only a small amount of shaft work required. This
                            could save a large part of the cold utility required.
                         •  Above the Pinch, a large and quite flat pocket is present in the CCC,
                            providing an opportunity to generate steam at the maximum level
                            of 180°C.
                         •  Above the Pinch, steam is preferred over flue gas for a hot utility because
                            the process stream temperatures are not too high.
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265