Page 128 - The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
P. 128

-  THE  GEOLOGICAL  INTERPRETATION  OF  WELL  LOGS  -
                       10.0    BS  {in)   20,                            -.2500—
                     scale                                         RHOB  (G/C3
                        0.0               20
                     Depth                                  {|   2.40g/cm*
                                                              LOG

                  4150m

                                     log
                                      caving}





                  117m

                      10         15         20       2.0     2.2   23   24   26   26   27   28   29
                          Caliper  scale,  inches               Density  log  scale.  g/cm?
         Figure  9.5  Typical  heading  of  a  density  log.  The  density  log  is  over  tracks  2  and  3:  the  scale  is  in  g/crn®.  Any  mud  weight
         correction  is  shown  in  log  form  (dashed)  and  is  automatically  applied.  It  is  based,  ia  this  example,  on  a  barite  mud  containing
         272ppm  barium  and  with  a  density  of  |.84g/cm’.

         Log  presentation,  scales  and  units            9.4  Log  characteristics
         The  density  log  is  normally  plotted  on  a  linear  scale  of
                                                           Depth  of investigation  and  bed  resolution
         bulk  density  (Figure  9.5).  The  log  is  run  across  tracks  2
                                                           Research  into  the  density  tool’s  characteristics  shows
         and  3,  most  often  with  a  scale  between  1.95  and  2.95
                                                           that  its  depth  of  investigation  is  very  shallow.  Figure  9.6
         g/cm?.  The  main  log  is  accompanied  by  a  curve  indicating
                                                           shows  that  90%  of  the  original  Schlumberger  FDC
         the  borehole  and  mud-cake  corrections  that  have  been
                                                           response  probably  originates  from  13cm  (Sin)  or  less
         automatically  applied.  A  record  of  cable  tension  may  also
                                                           from  the  tool.  These  are  experimental  results  using  a
         be  included,  as  the  density  tool  tends  to  stick  in  poor  holes.
                                                           sand  with  35%  porosity  (Sherman  and  Locke,  1975).  In
           The  tool  is  run  typically  as  a  density-nevtron  combination
                                                           normal  logging,  the  investigation  depth  will  probably  be
         along  with  a  gamma  ray  tool  and  a  caliper,  e.g.  CDL-GR-N
                                                           even  less,  especially  for  the  more  modem  tools,  around
         (Western  Atlas),  FDC-CNL-GR  or  LDT-CNL-NGT
                                                           10cm  (4in)  for  average  densities.  Consequently  the
         (Schlumberger).  The  caliper  is  an  essential  accompaniment
                                                           density  tool  is  likely  to  be  much  affected  by  hole  condi-
         to  the  density  log  for  reasons  of  quality  control.
                                                           tions.  Moreover,  in  porous  zones  where  the  too}  has  its
                                                           principal  petrophysical  use,  it  will  be  measuring  the

                                                           invaded  zone.  There  is  little  chance  of  it  detecting  fluids.
                                                           notably  liquid  hydrocarbons,  in  place.
                                                             While  the  depth  of  investigation  of  the  density  tool  is
                                                           small,  the  bed  resolution  is  good.  At  average  logging
          SIGNAL                                           speeds  (about  400m/h,  1300ft/h),  true  densities  can  be
                                                           read  in  beds  down  to  about  60cm  (2ft).  At  lower  logging
          %                                                speeds,  higher  sampling  rates  and  selective  processing,
                                                           it  may  be  possible  to  resolve  beds  down  to  15cm  (6")
          FACTOR                                           (Flaum  et  af.,  1987).  Partial  reaction  from  the  density  too]
                                                           may  be  caused  by  very  thin  beds,  especially  if  they
          J                                                have  a  very  high  or  very  low  density.  Caicareous  nodules
                             ————   Ps  near  detector  ishort)
                                    PL   tar  detector  (long)   5—10cm  thick,  for  example,  are  seen  as  peaks  on  the
                                                           drawing  bed  boundaries.

                                    Pp  epparent  bulk  dansity
                                                           density  log.
                                                             Good  bed  resolution  renders  the  density  log  useful  for
                                                           Unwanted  logging  effects
                            10      18      20     25m.
                                                           The  most  frequently  encountered  unwanted  logging
                     DISTANCE  from  BOREHOLE  WALL        effects  are  shown  in  Table  9.4.  The  shallow  depth  of
                                                           investigation  of  the  density  tool  makes  it  very  susceptible
         Figure  9.6  The  depth  of  investigation  of  the  density  tool  is
         very  shallow.  The  graphs  show  experimental  results  for  a  35%   to  hole  conditions,  despite  compensation  and  automatic
         porosity,  water-filled  sand.  (Re-drawn  from  Sherman  and   corrections.  The  density  log  should  be  interpreted  along
         Locke,  1975).                                    with  its  corresponding  caliper  log.
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133