Page 232 - The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
P. 232

-  THE  GEOLOGICAL  INTERPRETATION  OF  WELL  LOGS  -

       way,  fracture  infill  may  be  plucked  out  during  drilling  in   measured.  Adding  flowmeter  readings  allows  the  flowing
       the  immediate  vicinity  of  the  borehole  and  the  walls  of   fractures  to  be  separated  from  the  non-flowing  ones:
       the  fractures  broken,  so  enlarging  the  aperture.   essential  information  (Figure  13.32).
         Separating  drilling  induced  from  natura]  fractures  is
       notoriously  difficult.  On  cores,  distinctive  geometry  and   -  borehole  breakouts
       surface  features  are  used  (Kulander  ef  ad,  1990).  In  the   Because  of  its  sensitivity  to  borehole  geometry,  the
       subsurface.  a  combination  of  geometry  and  orientation  can   BHTY  is  an  excellent  indicator  of  breakouts  (Chapter  4).
       be  used  (Table  13.5,  Figure  13.31)  (Lincecum  e7  al.,  1993).   Breakouts  are  marked  by  hole  enlargement  in  the  direc-
       For  example,  most  drilling  induced  fractures  form  paraile]   tion  of  minimum  horizontal  stress,  Sh_,.  Enlargement
       to  the  maximum  horizontal  stress  direction  Sh,,,,  which   is  seen  on  the  amplitude  image  log  and  the  time  of  flight
       means  that  they  are  extensional  fractures.  The  Sh,,,  orien-   log  as  vertical  strips  indicating  poor  reflectivity  and  long
       tations  are  well  identified  from  breakouts  (see  below)  and   travel  time  or  lost  signal  (Figure  13.33)  (Paillet  and  Kim,
       may  be  used  to  define  preferred  fracture  orientation  (Figure   1987).  In  addition  to  the  images,  the  acoustic  caliper
        13.31).  Apart  from  this,  induced  fractures,  of  course,  are   derived  from  the  time  of  flight  measurements,  can  be  used
       never  mineralised  and  never  cause  bedding  offset.  For  nat-   to  indicate  the  hole  circumference  profile  (Figure  13.33).
       ural  fracture  classification,  the  important  distinctions  other   As  discussed  above,  the  use  of  breakouts  to  derive
       than  onentation  are  whether  the  feature  is  open  or  closed  or   present  day  in  situ  stress  orientations,  is  an  important
       mineralised.  As  described  (Section  13.7)  comparisons   phase  in  the  attempt  to  separate  natural  from  drilling
       between  amplitude  and  time  of  flight  images  can  suggest   induced  fractures.  Although  dipmeter  calipers  are  tradi-
       whether  a  fracture  is  open  or  mineralised,  open  fractures   tionally  used  for  breakout  analysis  (Chapter  4),  when
       having  an  image  on  both  logs,  mineralised  fractures  on   BHTY  images  are  available  they  are  far  more  effective
       only  the  amplitude  image  (Taylor,  1991).      and  more  precise.
         Despite  al]  the  difficulties,  fracture  studies  with
       acoustic  images  make  a  significant  contribution  to  reser-   —  texture,  lithology  &  sedimentary features
       voir  understanding.  This  is  well  illustrated  by  the  USGS   For  lithological  features  to  be  seen  on  the  acoustic
       technique  of  combining  image  studies  with  high  quality   images,  there  must  be  large  acoustic  impedance  contrasts.
       flowmeter  measurements  (Paillet  ef  ai,  1987;  Paillet,   The  coal  industry  has  long  used  the  BHTV  to  localise
        1991).  It  is  well  known  in  aquifer  studies  that  major  flow   coal  seams  and  give  accurate  bed  limits  (e.g.  Riibel  er  al.,
       is  usually  from  only  a  few  fractures.  Using  the  BHTV   1986).  However,  coal  seams  are  an  exception  in  terms  of
       allows  major  fractures  to  be  located  and  their  orjentations   lithology  and  more  general  lithological  investigations
                                       dipping  fracture

                                                                             BHTV

                                                              FARM

                                                                         exaggerated

                                                                           width
















                                                                                exaggerated
                                                                                   width
                                                                          T
                                                                                          N
                                                                               T
                                                                                    T

                                                                               S
                                                                                    Ww
                                                                          E
                                                                    N
                                                         s
                        Figure  13.30  Typical  characteristics  of  an  open  fracture  seen  on  an  acoustic  image
                        log.  The  fracture  width  becomes  exaggerated  at  certain  points  around  the  borehole
                        wall  as  a  result  of  drilling  damage  (re-drawn  from  Paillet  et  al.,  1985).  Note  this
                        effect  on  the  fractures  of  Figure  13.28.
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237