Page 118 - The Petroleum System From Source to Trap
P. 118

112     Peters and Cassa


             Table 5.4. Geochemical Information on the Fictitious Deer Shalea

             Well      Ro         h                                   p        SPI      TOC         HI
             No.       (%)       (m)      S,b      Szb    81 + S2b   (glcm3)   (t HC/m2)   (wt. %)   (mg HC/g TOC)
                      0.43       25       1 . 7     8       9.7      2  . 4    0.6       2.0       400
              2       0.42       37       1 . 8     8       9.8      2.4       0.9       2.0       400
              3       0.38       80       2.8      14      1 6 .8    2.4       3.2       2.8       500
              4       0.38      1 2 5     4.1      22      26. 1     2.4       7.8       4.4       500
              5       0.35      1 2 3     4.0      21      25.0      2.4       7.4       4.3       488

              6       0.45      1 0 5     3.1      1 6     19.1      2.4       4.8       3.6       444
              7       0.50      1 2 1     1 . 9    1 7     1 8 .9    2.4       5.5       4.0       425
              8       0.52       86       3.1      1 5     1 8 . 1    2.4      3.7       3.1       484
              9       0.50       45       2.9      1 6     1 8 .9    2.4       2.0       3.0       533
             1 0      0.65       75       3.0      1 5     1 8 .0    2.4       3.2       3.9       384

             1 1      0.78      1 5 0     2.0      1 0     1 2 .0    2.4       4.3       4.8       208
             1 2      0.56       80       5.3      27      32.3      2.4       6.2       5.2       5  1 9
             1 3      0.58      1 5 0     5.1      26      31 .1     2.4       1 1  . 2   5.2      500
             1 4      0.45      1 1 5     6.4      34      40.4      2.4       1 1  . 2   6.4      531
             1 5      0.60      1 4 6     5.1      26      31 .1     2.4      1 0 .9     5.1       51 0

             1 6      0.60      1 5 6     5.1      25      30.1      2.4      1 1 . 3    5.0       500
             1 7      0.55      1 3 0     5.2      26      31 .2     2.4       9.7       5.2       500
             a5ee equation 1 in text for definition of terms.
             bmg HCig dry rock.
               Sedimentary Basin Analysis                      because the frequency with which each 20 m interval is
               The data used to construct this hypothetical example   sampled and analyzed is different. For example,  a  10-m
             might  include  geochemical logs for  the  32 exploratory   core may be  sampled  and analyzed every 1  m  , whereas
             wells, as well as other types of geologic and geophysical   drill cuttings samples may be sampled every  10 m. The
             information that are not shown (Figure 5.12A). Informa­  lowest TOC  values are  nearest the  unconformity  at the
             tion from geochemical logs is summarized for 17 of these   top  of  the map, and  the  highest  TOC  values  are  where
             wells in Table  5.4.  The symbols in Figure 5.12A indicate   the  source rock is  immature at  the  bottom  of the  map.
             that the exploratory well is a dry hole, encountered  gas   From right to left, TOC values increase to 5.0 wt.  %, but
             or oil shows, or is an oil well.  A dry hole  indicates that   then decrease  with  burial  depth  to  about  3.0 wt.  %
             from well site drill cuttings examination, mud log, Rock­  because of  thermal  maturity.  This TOC map  suggests
             Eva!  pyrolysis, or other  geochemical  analyses,  there is a   that the Deer Shale is a very good to excellent source rock
             lack of petroleum. Oil and gas shows indicate that some   (Table 5.1).
             petroleum was encountered. The oil wells correlate with   To determine the present-day thermal maturity of the
             the fields  shown on  the  Deer-Boar  petroleum  system   Deer Shale  source rock, a vitrinite reflectace  value  was
             map and table (Figure  . 3 and Table 1 . 3, Chapter  1). The   determined for the base of the overlying  Boar Sandstone
                               1
             dashed  line represents the geographic extent of the same   reservoir rock,  and  this  value  was  contoured  (Figure
             petroleum system,  and  the  wavy  unconformity line   5.120). The isoreflectance map indicates that the base of
             represents the erosional edge of the source rock.   the reservoir rock was buried enough to  be in the oil
               The  isopach  map  of the  Deer  Shale  indicates  that  it   window (>0.6 % Ro) in two areas and has reached the gas
             thickens  from  25  to  150 m  (Figure 5.12B).  Because  of   window  (> 1.35 %Ro) on the left.  Because the source rock
             essentially uniform lithology vertically through the shale,   is only present in the west (left) and is thermally mature,
             this  is both a gross  and  net  source  rock  thickness. The   it is logical to conclude that the oil and gas shows and oil
             contours trend in a northwesterly direction and indicate   accumulations originated from this pod of mature source
             that  before or during the  deposition of the overlying   rock.  When the  thermal  maturity pattern is compared
             reservoir rock erosion stripped away the source rock east   with the TOC  map, the TOC  is  interpreted  to  decrease
             of the unconformity line.                         where the thermal maturity is highest.
               The TOC contour map of the Deer Shale source rock   Rock-Eva! pyrolysis data are summaried for 17 of the
             ranges from 2.0 to >6.0 wt.  % (Figure 5.12C  and  Table   32 wells (Table 5.4) to determine the hydrogen index (HI)
             5.4). The average TOC contoured is derived from the net   and  (SPI). The HI  shows  the  present-day  amount  of
             source  rock  thickness, that  is,  TCX:: data is  first averaged   hydrogen in the source rock organic matter and indicates
             over 20  m  intervals then these  20  m  intervals are   the kerogen type or quality (Table 5.2).  HI is the � peak
             averaged. This  procedure  is used  to  average TOC   (mg HC/g rock) divided by the TOC:  (mg TOC/g rock)
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123