Page 104 -
P. 104

._.        ~      ~_.:::::::   ~  ~::::::  ........ ~  ~   Pump  Selection  and  Purchasing


                evaluation  to  the  factors  that  will  encourage  or  even  ensure  increased
                reliability of the pump.
                The  most  straightforward  method  is to  assess a penalty to  any factors in
                the  evaluation which  can  be  considered  less than  ideal.  The  penalty can
                take  a variety of forms  and may often  be  fairly subjective.  However,  the
                more  objective the  assessment, the  more  reliable the  evaluation will be.

              5.3.3  Factors involved  in mechanical  suitability

                5.3.3.1  Mechanical  seals
               The  most  obvious  example  is  the  mechanical  seal  as it  is  that  part  of a
               pump  that  most  frequently  fails.    Consequently  it  is  highly
               recommended  that  a  decision  on  which  seal  supplier,  model  and
               materials  is  needed  should  be  finalized  up  front  and  included  in  the
               pump  specification.  This  helps  all  pump  vendors  and  ensures  you  get
               what you  really need,  rather  than  the  cheapest  available  on  the  market.
               However,  if  a  variety  of  seals  have  been  offered  in  the  various  bids
               received,  there  are  a  number  of  design  features  which  can  be  clearly
               identified  and evaluated.
               (a)   For  example,  the  cartridge  design  is simpler  and  safer to  use  than
                     the  component  seal.  It protects  the  seal faces  against damage  and
                     reduces  the  time  and  skill level required  for installation.  It  can  be
                     argued  that  a  sound  evaluation  assessment  for  not  providing  a
                     cartridge  seal  may  be  the  addition  of  the  cost  of  an  additional
                     spare seal of the  type originally quoted.
               (b)   Any  seal which  has  a dynamic  secondary  seal will inevitably cause
                     fretting  corrosion which leaves a damaged  shaft. With this type  of
                     a  seal,  the  shaft  must  be  protected  by  a  sleeve which  will  require
                     frequent  replacement.  A  non-fretting  design will not  need  a shaft
                     sleeve,  thus  eliminating  one  spare  part.  It  also  allows  a  larger
                     diameter  (and thus  a stronger)  shaft.
                One  suggestion  would  be  that,  when  a  fretting  seal  design  is  offered,
               the  bidders  could  be  assessed  an  amount  equal  to  the  value  of  one
               sleeve  every  two  years.  A  similar  kind  of assessment  can  be  conducted
               for  the  various  types  of  springs  or  bellows  used  as  some  are  more
               suitable than  others for different  services.

                5.3.3.2  Seal environment
               A large bore  seal chamber will permit  any mechanical  seal to last longer.
               If any  bidders  do  not  offer  this,  they  could  be  assessed  the  price  of an
                additional  spare seal of the type originally quoted.




                                                     --                j
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109