Page 140 - How Great Leaders Build Abundant Organizations That Win
P. 140

WHOM DO I TRAVEL WITH? (RELATIONSHIPS AND TEAMS [TH]AT WORK)



        common pattern, one partner begins to distance from the
        other, showing outward signs of disinterest and withdrawal
        as things heat up. The other partner gets frustrated and ups
        the ante, raising the volume, moving closer, determined to
        make the distancer come back and face the music. Observers
        can see that the pursuer looks anxious and frustrated, and the
        monitors confirm that blood pressure is rising and adrenaline
        is pumping. But the monitors also pick up something quite
        unexpected about the cool, disinterested distancer. That part-
        ner’s physiological signs of stress (blood pressure, adrenaline
        response, activation of the part of the brain that responds to
        a threat), though unseen, are also extreme. While the two
        display their stress differently on the outside, both are being
        flooded by intense feelings of anxiety and stress. In fact, the
        apparent escape artist’s stress levels are so high as to interfere
        with clear thinking and problem-solving skill. Being chased by
        the outwardly upset spouse only makes the problem worse.
          Some of us have seen similar patterns at work, even if the
        outward display of emotion is more restrained there. Only
        when both individuals agree to come back to the problem at
        a later time when their physiology has calmed down are they
        likely to get very far with a resolution.
          Spouses, bosses, and friends can go a long way to improve
        the emotional climate in a given setting by avoiding what
        John Gottman calls the “four deadly horsemen” of criticism,
        contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling. These charac-
        teristics so powerfully undercut marriages that if they show
        up steadily in the first three minutes of a marital conversa-
        tion, researchers can predict with 96 percent accuracy that
        the conversation will end badly. The long-term prediction for
        divorce or deep dissatisfaction with the marriage follows the
        same pattern. In contrast, whether at work or in marriage, if


                                   121
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145