Page 735 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 735

0066_Frame_C23  Page 43  Friday, January 18, 2002  5:31 PM






                                                                             .
                       where c is the viscous friction or damping coefficient with SI units [N   s/m]. Third, induced strain ε in
                       the piezoceramic material is proportional to the applied voltage V z (t) [5], and by Hooke’s Law, the induced
                       stress σ is proportional to the induced strain ε. Hence, the induced force F p (t) (stress σ times the cross-
                       sectional area) is proportional to the applied voltage V z (t), i.e.,

                                                        F p t() =  bV z t()                     (23.99)

                       where b is a constant with SI units [N/V]. Rewriting Eq. (23.96) in terms of the three external forces,
                       the equation of motion becomes

                                 3
                                ∑  F i t() =  F S t() +  F D t() + F p t() =  – kz t() –  cz t() + bV z t() =  mz ˙˙ t()  (23.100)
                                                                      ˙
                                i=1
                       which is called the mass-spring-damper model. Note that the relationship between the input voltage V z (t)
                       and the displacement z(t) of the probe tip (i.e., the model of the dynamics) is a second order differential
                       equation. The response of the probe tip (displacement of mass m) to an applied voltage V z (t) can be
                       obtained in the frequency-domain by using the Laplace transform technique [6, Chapter 2, section 5];
                       however, the state-space approach can be used to obtain the solution directly in the time-domain. In the
                       remaining sections, the state-space approach to modeling is presented and the mass-spring-damper model
                       of the piezo-tube actuator will be used as an example.
                       States of a System
                       We begin by introducing the concept of a state, which is the basis for the state-space approach. In general,
                       a state can be defined as the following:

                         The state x(t 0 ) of a dynamic system at time t 0  is a set of variables that, together with the input u(t),
                         for t ≥ t 0 , determines the behavior of the system for all t ≥ t 0  [7, Chapter 2, section 1.1].
                         Fundamental to this definition is the notion that the state summarizes the current configuration of a
                       system. Therefore, the memory of a dynamical system is preserved in the state variables at the current
                       time  t 0  (called initial condition), and the future behavior of the system is determined by the initial
                       condition x(t 0 ) and the applied input u(t), for t ≥ t 0 . The state of a system can be written as the set

                                                               x 1 t()

                                                        xt() =  x 2 t()                        (23.101)
                                                                 M
                                                               x n t()

                                               1
                       where n is the number of states.  Any set of variables that satisfy the above definition can be a valid state,
                       hence the state is not unique [8, Chapter 2, section 2].
                       Example
                       The state variables required to describe the mass-spring-damper system can be chosen as the position
                       z(t) and velocity  (t) of the mass. We can write the state vector as
                                    z ˙

                                                           x 1 t()  zt()
                                                    xt() =       =                             (23.102)
                                                           x 2 t()  z ˙ t()


                         1
                         For a discussion on the minimal set of states required to describe a system (minimal realization), see [7, Chapter 7].

                      ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   730   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740