Page 763 - The Mechatronics Handbook
P. 763

0066_Frame_C24  Page 11  Thursday, January 10, 2002  3:44 PM








                       close to the resonant frequency. For example, if a system has eigenvalues λ 1,2  = −0.05 ±  j, i.e., the resonant
                       frequency is 1 rad/s and, additionally, one of the input components is a sine wave of frequency 0.9 rad/s,
                       then the system output exhibits a very large (forced) oscillation with amplitude initially growing almost
                       linearly and later, stabilizing to a constant value. In real situations this phenomenon may destroy the
                       system (recall the Tacoma bridge case).

                       State Similarity Transformation
                       We have already said that the choice of state variables is nonunique. Say that we have a system with input
                                                                           n
                       u(t), output y(t), and two different choices of state vectors: x(t) ∈    with an associated 4-tuple (A, B,
                                                                   ,
                                                               ,,
                                       n
                                x
                       C, D), and  (t) ∈    with an associated 4-tuple (ABCD  ). Then there exists a nonsingular matrix
                           n×n
                       T ∈   such that
                                                                       –
                                                 x t() =  Tx t() ⇔  x t() =  T x t()            (24.58)
                                                                       1
                       This leads to the following equivalences:
                                                A =  TAT ,  B =  TB,  C =  CT  – 1              (24.59)
                                                        1
                                                        –
                         Different choices of state variables may or may not respond to different phenomenological approaches
                       to the system analysis. Sometimes it is just a question of mathematical simplicity, as we shall see in section
                       24.6. In other occasions, the decision is made considering relative facility to measure certain system variables.
                       However, what is important is that, no matter which state description is chosen, certain fundamental
                       system characteristics do not change. They are related to the fact that the system eigenvalues are invariant
                       with respect to similarity transformations, since
                                                                           (
                                                  (
                                                                                       –
                                                               1
                                                                                        1
                                                              –
                                                        1
                                                       –
                                                                                     (
                                      (
                                   det lIA) =   det lTT –  TAT ) =  det T()det lIA)det T )      (24.60)
                                                                               –
                                         –
                                              =  det lIA)                                       (24.61)
                                                  (
                                                      –
                         Hence, stability, nature of the unforced response, and speed of response are invariants with respect to
                       similarity transformations.
                       Example 24.3
                       Consider the electric network shown in Fig. 24.4
                                                            T
                                                                        T
                         We choose the state vector x(t) = [x 1 (t) x 2 (t)]  = [i L (t) v c (t)] . Also u(t) = v f (t). Using first principles
                       we have that
                                                             1
                                              dx t()  0      --- L  x t() +  0  ut()            (24.62)
                                              ------------- =
                                                                         1
                                               dt      1    R +  R 2    ----------
                                                             1
                                                      – ---  – ------------------  R C
                                                       C    R R C        1
                                                               2
                                                             1
                                                                  i  (t)  i  (t)
                                                                          2
                                                    R
                                                     1
                                           +
                                       v  (t)
                                        f                    C     L          R   v  (t)
                                                                               2  C
                                                                 i  (t)
                                                                 L
                       FIGURE 24.4  Electric network.
                       ©2002 CRC Press LLC
   758   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768