Page 62 - Using ANSYS for Finite Element Analysis A Tutorial for Engineers
P. 62

IntroductIon to FInIte element AnAlysIs   •   49


                         A problem      Anticipate    A problem      Preprocess
                          must be        physical      must be       prepare the
                          solved         behavior      solved        FE model
                                        plan how
                                        FE results
                                         will be     Plan revised
                          Is FE    Yes  checked to    FE model
                          analysis                   using insight
                         required?      see if they                    Solve
                                          are        provided by    equations of
                                        reasonable   the current    the FE model
                                                      FE model
                        Analytical or
                        experimental                      No
                          solution                                   Postprocess
                                           Are results reasonable?   display FE
                                   Yes    Are error estimates small?  results
                           Stop           Does model revision do little
                                           to alter computed results?  Computer
                                                                      software
                      Figure 1.11.  Outline of an FE analysis project.

                      kinds of elements, and enough of them, to represent the physical action
                      adequately. Figure 1.11 gives an outline of an FEA project.



                      1.9.1  Modeling error

                      Whatever  the analysis method, we do not analyze  the actual  physical
                      problem; rather, we analyze a mathematical model of it. Thus, we intro-
                      duce modeling error. For example, in the elementary beam theory, we
                      represent a beam by a line (its axis) and typically ignore deformations
                      associated with transverse shear. This is an excellent approximation for
                      slender beams, but not for very short beams. Or, for axial load problem
                      of  Figure 1.12, we would probably assume that a state of uniaxial stress
                      prevails throughout the bar, which is proper if taper is slight, but improper
                      if taper is pronounced. Real structures are not so easily classified, as they
                      are often built of parts that would be idealized mathematically in differ-
                      ent  ways  and  have  cutouts,  stiffeners,  and  connectors  whose  behavior
                      is uncertain.
                          The foregoing considerations must be addressed in order to decide what
                      types of elements to use and how many of them. If a beam is deep, trans-
                      verse shear deformation may become important and should be included
                      in beam elements. If a beam is very deep, two- or three- dimensional ele-
                      ments are more appropriate than beam elements. If a beam has a wide
                      cross-section, the plate theory may be more appropriate than beam theory
                      (then, of course, choose plate elements rather than beam elements). If an
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67