Page 343 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 343

T1: IML
                           QC: IML/FFX
              P2: IML/FFX
  P1: IML/FFX
                                                        17:40
                                           June 22, 2007
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
  AT029-07
            AT029-Manual
                                           7. APPLICATIONS: ESTIMATION OF THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES 323
                   TABLE 7.9—Coefficients of Eq. 7.50 for calculation of enthalpy of vaporization of pure compounds versus temperature [9].
                                                       vap
                                                      H  [kJ/kg] = A(1 − T r )  B+CT r
                                                       T
            Compound           A           B          C       Compound                  A           B           C
            Water           2612.982     −0.0577    0.3870    Methylcyclopentane      527.6931     0.3967     0.0000
            Ammonia         1644.157     −0.017     0.3739    Ethylcyclopentane       502.1246     0.3912     0.0000
            H 2 S            754.073      0.3736    0.0000    Pentylcyclopentane      442.0789     0.3800     0.0000
            CO 2             346.1986    −0.6692    0.9386    Decylcyclopentane       397.8670     0.3800     0.0000
            N 2              228.9177    −0.1137    0.4281    Pentadecylcyclopentane  372.6050     0.3800     0.0000
            CH 4             570.8220    −0.1119    0.4127    Cyclohexane             534.5225     0.3974     0.0000
            C 2 H 6          588.1554     0.0045    0.3236    Methylcyclohexane       503.9656     0.4152     0.0000
            C 3 H 8          610.2175     0.3649    0.0000    Ethylene                679.2083     0.3746     0.0000
            n-C 4 H 10       568.6540     0.3769    0.0000    Propylene               539.9479     0.0169     0.0000
            n-C 5 H 12       540.6440     0.3838    0.0000    Benzene                 651.8210     0.6775    −0.2695
            n-C 6 H 14       515.2685     0.3861    0.0000    Toluene                 544.7929     0.3859     0.0000
            n-C 7 H 16       497.0039     0.3834    0.0000    Ethylbenzene            515.2839     0.3922     0.0000
            n-C 8 H 18       489.0450     0.4004    0.0000    o-Xylene                521.7788     0.3771     0.0000
            n-C 10 H 22      461.4396     0.3909    0.0000    Propylbenzene           500.4582     0.3967     0.0000
            n-C 15 H 32      431.6786     0.4185    0.0000    n-Butylbenzene          470.0009     0.3808     0.0000
            n-C 20 H 42      407.3617     0.4089    0.0000    n-Octylbenzene          456.0581     0.4281     0.0000
            Cyclopentane     517.7318     0.1808    0.1706    Naphthalene             371.4852    −0.3910     0.0000
                                                                                           vap
            f (0) (T r ) and f  (1) (T r ) are correlated to (1 − T r ), where as T r → 1,  meters. Once the value of  H nbp  is calculated, it should be
             H vap /RT c → 0. However, more accurate predictive methods  divided by M to convert its unit from kJ/kmol to kJ/kg.
            are developed in two steps. In the first step heat of vaporiza-  Equation (7.56) with coefficients given in Table 7.10 can be
            tion at normal boiling point,  H vap , is calculated and then
                                        nbp                       used for fractions with molecular weight range of 70–300 (∼T b
            corrected to the desired temperature by a second correla-  of 300–600 K) with accuracy of about 2% when tested against
            tion. One of the most successful correlations for prediction  138 pure hydrocarbons. Application of the equation can be
                 vap                                                                                              vap
            of  H   was proposed by Riedel [12]:                  extended up to 700 K with reasonable accuracy. Once  H
                 nbp                                                                                              nbp
                                                                  is determined, the Watson relation can be used to calculate
            (7.54)      H vap  = 1.093RT c T br  ln P c − 1.013    H vap  at the desired temperature (T).
                          nbp
                                          0.93 − T br
                                                                                                   	 0.38

                                                                                         vap
            where T br is the reduced boiling point (T b /T c ) and P c is the  (7.57)   H vap  =  H nbp  1 − T r
            critical pressure in bars. The unit of  H vap  depends on the                    1 − T br
                                              nbp
            units of R and T c . Later Chen and Vetere developed similar  where T r and T br are the reduced temperature and reduced
            correlations for calculation of  H vap  in terms of P c and T br  boiling point, respectively. The same equation can be used to
                                        nbp
            [12]. For example, Chen correlation is in the following form:  calculate  H vap  at any temperature when its value at one tem-
                                                                  perature is available. As it was shown in Example 7.5, use of
            (7.55)   H vap     3.978T br − 3.958 + 1.555 ln P c   Eqs. (7.54) and (7.57) predicts  H vap  of petroleum fractions
                     nbp  = RT c T br                                                                             --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
                                       1.07 − T br                with good accuracy. Tsonopoulos et al. [18] modified the orig-
            Although for certain pure compounds the Chen correlation  inal Lee–Kesler correlation for calculation of heat of vapor-
            is slightly superior to the Riedel method, but for practical  ization of coal liquids and aromatics in the following form:
            applications especially for petroleum fractions in which T c  (7.58)  ( H vap ) T r =0.8  = RT c (4.0439 + 5.3826ω)
            and P c are calculated values, the Riedel equation is reasonably
                                                vap
            accurate. A more direct calculation of  H  for petroleum  where R is 8.314 J/mol · K, T c is the critical temperature in
                                               nbp                                                 vap
            fractions is use of fraction’s bulk properties such as T b and  kelvin, ω is the acentric factor, and  H  is the heat of va-
            SG or other available parameters in an equation similar to  porization at T = 0.8T c in J/mol. Equation (7.57) can be used
            Eq. (2.38) [28]:                                      to calculate  H vap  at temperatures other than T r = 0.8. An
                                                                                                            vap
                                                                  evaluation of various methods for estimation of  H nbp  of sev-
                                        b c
            (7.56)              H vap  = aθ θ
                                  nbp   1 2                       eral coal liquid samples is shown in Tables 7.11 and 7.12.
            where  H vap  is in J/mol (or kJ/kmol) and constants a, b, and  Basic calculated parameters are given in Table 7.11, while es-
                    nbp                                           timated values of  H vap  from Riedel, Vetere, Riazi–Daubert,
            c are given in Table 7.10 for a number of different input para-        nbp
                                                                  and Lee–Kesler are given in Table 7.12. In Table 7.11, M is
                                                                  calculated from Eq. (2.51), which is recommended for heavy
             TABLE 7.10—Coefficients of Eq. (7.56) for estimation of heat of  fractions. If Eq. (2.50) were used to estimate M, the %AAD
            vaporization of petroleum fractions at the normal boiling point [28].  for the four methods increase to 4.5, 3.2, 4.9, and 2.3, re-
                                      vap   b c                   spectively. Equation (2.50) is not applicable to heavy fractions
                            (7.56)   H  = aθ θ
                                      nbp   1 2                   (M > 300), which shows the importance of the characteriza-
              vap
             H nbp , J/mol  θ 1  θ 2  A      b          c         tion method used to calculate molecular weight of hydrocar-
               vap
             H        T b , K  SG  37.32315  1.14086  9.77089 × 10 −3
              1,nbp                                               bon fractions. Evaluations shown in Table 7.12 indicate that
             H vap    T b ,K  I   39.7655  1.13529  0.024139      both the Riedel method and Eq. (7.56) predict heats of va-
              2,nbp
             H vap     M     I  5238.3846  0.5379  0.48021        porization with good accuracy despite their simplicity. For a
              3,nbp                                               coal liquid sample 5HC in Table 7.11, experimental data on

   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348