Page 382 - Characterization and Properties of Petroleum Fractions - M.R. Riazi
P. 382

P1: JDW
                        AT029-Manual-v7.cls
                                           June 22, 2007
                                                        14:25
  AT029-08
            AT029-Manual
         362 CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPERTIES OF PETROLEUM FRACTIONS
          To estimate binary diffusion coefficients for hydrocarbon
         gases at low pressures, Eq. (8.59) and for nonhydrocar-   where
         bons Eq. (8.58) can be used. For liquid hydrocarbons at     A = 37.34745 − 0.20611M + 141.1265SG − 637.727I 20
         low pressure, diffusion coefficients at infinite dilution can    − 6.757T + 6.98(T ) − 0.81(T ) ,
                                                                                                ∗ 3
                                                                                       ∗ 2
                                                                               ∗
         be estimated from Eq. (8.60) or (8.61) and for the effect             b       b        b
         of concentration on binary diffusion coefficients Eq. (8.64)  B =−15.5437 + 0.046603M − 42.8873SG + 211.6542I 20
                                                                                                ∗ 3
                                                                                      ∗ 2
         should be used. For both liquids and gases at high pressures,  + 1.676T − 1.8(T ) + 0.212(T ) ,
                                                                               ∗
                                                                                      b
                                                                               b
                                                                                                b
         Eq. (8.67) is highly recommended and Eq. (8.66) can be used  T = (1.8T b − 459.67)/1.8
                                                                     ∗
         as alternative method for diffusivity of a gas in oil under reser-  b
         voir conditions. When using Eq. (8.67) recommended meth-  in which T b is the average boiling point in Kelvin, μ
         ods for calculation of low-pressures properties must be used.  is in cP, and parameter I should be determined at the
         For multicomponent gas mixtures at low pressure, Eq. (8.68)  same temperature as μ is desired. (Parameter I can be
         and for liquids or gases at high pressures Eq. (8.69) is recom-  determined as discussed for its use in Eq. (8.78).)
         mended to calculate effective diffusion coefficients. Effect of  For kerosene sample of Problem 8.2, calculate visco-
         porous media on diffusion coefficient can be calculated from  sity based on the above method and obtain the error.
         Eqs. (8.70) and (8.74). Self-diffusion coefficients or when re-  8.4. Methane gas is dissolved in the kerosene sample of Prob-
         fractive index is available, Eq. (8.78) can be used.      lem 8.2, at 333 K (140 F) and 20.7 bar (300 psia). The
                                                                                      ◦
          Surface tension of pure compounds should be calculated   mole fraction of methane is 0.08. For this fluid mix-
         from Eq. (8.85) and defined mixtures from Eq. (8.86) with  ture calculate density, viscosity, and thermal conductiv-
         parachors given in Table 8.14 or Eq. (8.86) for n-alkanes.  ity from appropriate methods. The experimental value
         For undefined petroleum fraction surface tension can be    of density is 5.224 kmol/m .
                                                                                         3
         calculated from Eq. (8.90). For defined petroleum fractions  8.5. Estimate diffusion coefficient of methane in kerosene
         (known PNA composition), Eq. (8.93) is recommended. For   sample of Problem 8.4 from Eqs. (8.65)–(8.67).
         coal liquid fractions Eq. (8.91) may be used. Equation (8.95)  8.6. Estimate thermal conductivity of N 2 at 600 F and 3750
                                                                                                       ◦
         is recommended for calculation of IFT of water–hydrocarbon  and 10 000 psia. Compare the result with values of 0.029
         systems. For specific cases, recommended methods are dis-  and 0.0365 Btu/ft · h · F as reported in the API-TDB [5].
                                                                                    ◦
         cussed in Section 8.6.2.                              8.7. Consider an equimolar mixture of C 1 ,C 3 , and N 2 at 14
          In addition to predictive methods, two methods for experi-
         mental measurement of diffusion coefficient and surface ten-  bar and 311 K. The binary diffusion coefficient of D C1–C3
                                                                                        −4
                                                                                                      −4
                                                                                                           2
                                                                                                        cm /s, re-
                                                                   and D C1–N2 are 88.3 × 10
                                                                                           and 187 × 10
         sion are presented in Sections 8.5 and 8.6.1. Furthermore,  spectively. The mixture density is 0.551 kmol/m . Esti-
                                                                                                           3
         the interrelationship among various transport properties, ef-  mate the effective diffusion coefficient of methane in the
         fects of porous media and concept of wettability, calculation  mixture from Eq. (8.68) and compare it with the value
         of capillary pressure and the role, and importance of interfa-  calculated from Eqs. (8.67) and (8.69).
         cial tension in enhanced oil recovery processes are discussed.  8.8. A petroleum fraction has boiling point and specific grav-
         It is also shown that choice of characterization method could  ity of 429 K and 0.761, respectively. The experimen-
         have a significant impact on calculation of transport proper-  tal value of surface tension at 25 C is 22.3 mN/m [59].
                                                                                              ◦
         ties of petroleum fractions.
                                                                   Calculate the surface tension at this temperature from
                                                                   the following methods and compare them against the
                                                                   experimental value.
         8.8 PROBLEMS                                              a. Five different methods presented by Eqs. (8.88)–(8.92)
                                                                     with estimated input parameters from the API-TDB
          8.1. Pure methane gas is being displaced in a fluid mixture  methods.
             of C 1 , n-C 4 , and n-C 10 with composition of 41, 27, and  b. Equation (8.93) with predicted PNA distribution.
             32 mol%, respectively. Reported measured diffusion co-  c. Fawcett’s method for parachor (Eq. 8.94).
             efficient of pure methane in the fluid mixture under the  d. Firoozabadi’s method for parachor.
             conditions of 344 K and 300 bar is 1.01 × 10 −4  cm /s [9].
                                                      2
             a. Calculate density and viscosity of fluid.
             b. Estimate diffusion coefficient of methane from
               Sigmund method (Eq. 8.65).                     REFERENCES
             c. Estimate diffusion coefficient of methane from
               Eq. 8.67.                                       [1] Bird, R. B., Stewart, W. E., and Lightfoot, E. N., Transport
          8.2. Hill and Lacy measured viscosity of a kerosene sample at  Phenomena Processes, Wiley, New York, 1960; 2nd ed., 1999.
             333 K and 1 atm as 1.245 mPa · s [51]. For this petroleum  [2] Gallant, R. W. and Yaws, C. L., Physical Properties of
             fraction, M = 167 and SG = 0.7837. Estimate the viscos-  Hydrocarbons, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX,
                                                                  1992.
             ity from two most suitable methods and compare with  [3] Alberty, R. A. and Silbey, R. J., Physical Chemistry, 2nd ed.,
             given experimental value.                            Wiley, New York, 1999.
          8.3. Riazi and Otaibi [21] developed the following relation  [4] Hirschfelder, O. J., Curtiss, C. F., and Bird, R. B., Molecular
             for estimation of viscosity of liquid petroleum fractions  Theory of Gases and Liquids, Wiley, New York, 1964.
             based on Eq. (8.78):                              [5] Daubert, T. E. and Danner, R. P., Eds., API Technical Data
                                                                  Book—Petroleum Refining, 6th ed., American Petroleum
                             1/μ = A + B/I                        Institute (API), Washington, DC, 1997.
                                                                                                                     --`,```,`,``````,`,````,```,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---


   Copyright ASTM International
   Provided by IHS Markit under license with ASTM             Licensee=International Dealers Demo/2222333001, User=Anggiansah, Erick
   No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS  Not for Resale, 08/26/2021 21:56:35 MDT
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387