Page 157 - Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach
P. 157

Guo, Boyun / Computer Assited Petroleum Production Engg 0750682701_chap11 Final Proof page 152  3.1.2007 8:54pm Compositor Name: SJoearun




               11/152  EQUIPMENT DESIGN AND SELECTION
                For design purposes, condition s h # s y should be con-  temperature profile in oil- and gas-production pipelines
               firmed, and increasing wall thickness or reducing test pres-  are essential to designing and evaluating pipeline oper-
               sure should be considered in other cases. For offshore  ations.
               pipelines connected to riser sections requiring P h ¼ 1:4P i ,
               it is recommended to consider testing the riser separately  11.4.2.2.1 Insulation Materials Polypropylene, poly-
               (for prefabricated sections) or to determine the hydrotest  ethylene, and polyurethane are three base materials
               pressure based on the actual internal pressure experienced  widely used in the petroleum industry for pipeline insulation.
               by the pipeline section. It is important to note that most  Their thermal conductivities are given in Table 11.4 (Carter
               pressure testing of subsea pipelines is done with water, but  et al., 2002). Depending on applications, these base materials
               on occasion, nitrogen or air has been used. For low D/t  are used in different forms, resulting in different overall
               ratios (<20), the actual hoop stress in a pipeline tested  conductivities. A three-layer polypropylene applied to pipe
               from the surface is overestimated when using the thin  surface has a conductivity of 0.225 W/M-8C (0.13 btu/hr-ft-
               wall equations provided in this chapter. Credit for this  8F), while a four-layer polypropylene has a conductivity of
               effect is allowed by DnV Clause 4.2.2.2 but is not normally  0.173 W/M-8C (0.10 btu/hr-ft-8F). Solid polypropylene has
               taken into account.                       higher conductivity than polypropylene foam. Polymer
                                                         syntactic polyurethane has a conductivity of 0.121 W/M-8C
               ExampleProblem11.6 Calculatetherequiredwallthickness  (0.07 btu/hr-ft-8F), while glass syntactic polyurethane has a
               forthepipelineinExampleProblem11.4assumingaseamless  conductivity of 0.156 W/M-8C (0.09 btu/hr-ft-8F). These
               still pipe of X-60 grade and onshore gas field (external  materials have lower conductivities in dry conditions such as
               pressure P e ¼ 14:65 psia).               that in pipe-in-pipe (PIP) applications.
                                                          Because of their low thermal conductivities, more and
               Solution The wall thickness can be designed based on the  more polyurethane foams are used in deepwater pipeline
               hoop stress generated by the internal pressure Pi ¼  applications. Physical properties of polyurethane foams
               2,590 psia. The design pressure is        include density, compressive strength, thermal conductiv-
                                                         ity, closed-cell content, leachable halides, flammability,
                   P d ¼ P i   P e ¼ 2,590   14:65 ¼ 2,575:35 psi:  tensile strength, tensile modulus, and water absorption.
               The weld efficiency factor is E w ¼ 1:0. The temperature  Typical values of these properties are available elsewhere
               de-rating factor F t ¼ 1:0. Table 11.3 gives h ¼ 0:72.  (Guo et al., 2005).
               The yield stress is s y ¼ 60,000 psi. A corrosion allowance  In steady-state flow conditions in an insulated pipeline
               1                                         segment, the heat flow through the pipe wall is given by
               ⁄ 16 in. is considered. The nominal pipeline wall thickness
               can be calculated using Eq. (11.116) as   Q r ¼ UA r DT,                    (11:131)
                            (2,574:3)(6)  1              where Q r is heat-transfer rate; U is overall heat-transfer
                  t NOM ¼               þ   ¼ 0:2413 in:
                       2(1:0)(0:72)(60,000)(1:0)  16     coefficient (OHTC) at the reference radius; A r is area of
                                                         the pipeline at the reference radius; DT is the difference in
               Considering that welding of wall thickness less than 0.3 in.
               requires special provisions, the minimum wall thickness is  temperature between the pipeline product and the ambient
               taken, 0.3 in.                            temperature outside.
                                                          The OHTC, U, for a system is the sum of the thermal
                                                         resistances and is given by (Holman, 1981):
               11.4.2.2 Insulation Design                             1
               Oil and gas field pipelines are insulated mainly to conserve  U ¼     n    ,  (11:132)
               heat. The need to keep the product fluids in the pipeline at  1  þ  P  ln (r mþ1 =r m )  þ  1
                                                            A r A i h i  2pLk m  A o h o
               a temperature higher than the ambient temperature could  m¼1
               exist, for reasons including the following:
               . Preventing formation of gas hydrates    Table 11.4 Thermal Conductivities of Materials Used in
               . Preventing formation of wax or asphaltenes       Pipeline Insulation
               . Enhancing product flow properties
               . Increasing cool-down time after shutting down                Thermal conductivity
               In liquefied gas pipelines, such as liquefied natural gas,  Material name  W/M-8C  Btu/hr-ft-8F
               insulation is required to maintain the cold temperature of
               the gas to keep it in a liquid state.     Polyethylene       0.35           0.20
                Designing pipeline insulation requires thorough knowl-  Polypropylene  0.22  0.13
               edge of insulation materials and heat transfer mechanisms  Polyurethane  0.12  0.07
               across the insulation. Accurate predictions of heat loss and

               Table 11.5 Typical Performance of Insulated Pipelines
                                                         U-Value                 Water depth (M)

                                                                     2
                                                        2
                        Insulation type        (Btu=hr   ft   F)  W=M   K    Field proven  Potential
               Solid polypropylene                   0.50           2.84        1,600      4,000
               Polypropylene foam                    0.28           1.59         700       2,000
               Syntactic polyurethane                0.32           1.81        1,200      3,300
               Syntactic polyurethane foam           0.30           1.70        2,000      3,300
               Pipe-in-pipe syntactic polyurethane foam  0.17       0.96        3,100      4,000
               Composite                             0.12           0.68        1,000      3,000
               Pipe-in-pipe high efficiency          0.05           0.28        1,700      3,000
               Glass syntactic polyurethane          0.03           0.17        2,300      3,000
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162