Page 335 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 335

326                                  6. DECONVOLUTION

                                                             FIG. 6.14  Block diagram of spiking deconvolution
                                                             application in the time domain by inverse filtering. (*)
                                                             denotes convolution.
































           FIG. 6.15  Application of deconvolution with inverse filtering in the time domain corresponds to multiplication in the fre-
           quency domain. (A) Amplitude spectrum of the recorded seismogram, (B) inverse of (A), and (C) amplitude spectrum of
           deconvolved output.

           The inverse of this wavelet e wzðÞ can then be  TABLE 6.2 Deconvolution Output Obtained by
           obtained by a MacLaurin series expansion as a  Convolving the Input Minimum Phase Wavelet w(t) ¼
                                                        (2,  1) With the First Three Terms of the Inverse Filter
           summation of an infinite number of terms
                                                        Operator h(t) ¼ (1/2, 1/4, 1/8)
                    1   1   1   1  2  1  3  1  4
            e wzðÞ ¼   ¼ + z + z +     z +   z + ⋯⋯:                 2     21                Output
                  2 z   2   4   8    16    32
                                                        1/8    1/4   1/2                     1
           Here, the coefficients of the variable z (1/2, 1/4,  1/8  1/4   1/2               0
           1/8, 1/16, 1/32,…) give the deconvolution oper-
           ator h(t). Even though the operator is of an infi-        1/8   1/4   1/2         0
           nite number of samples, they rapidly decay to                   1/8   1/4   1/2    0.125
           zero, and in practice the number of samples in
           the operator is truncated. If we consider the first
           three terms h(t) ¼ (1/2, 1/4, 1/8) and convolve  spike, it is closer to a zero-lag spike than the
           them with the input wavelet w(t)¼(2,  1), we  input wavelet. If we continue attempts by consid-
           get  the   deconvolved  output   shown   in  ering the first four terms (1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16)
           Table 6.2. Although the result is not a perfect  of the operator to determine whether we get a
   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340