Page 493 - Acquisition and Processing of Marine Seismic Data
P. 493

484                      10. NORMAL MOVEOUT CORRECTION AND STACKING





















           FIG. 10.26  Ray diagram for a paraxial ray (black) from source S to receiver G in the vicinity of a normal ray (red) in a 2D
           laterally inhomogeneous medium. An NIP wave (blue wave front) is produced by a point source located at point NIP on the
           reflector, while a normal wave (green wave front) is generated by an exploding reflectors experiment at point NIP. Here, x 0 and
           x m represent the zero-offset and midpoint coordinates, respectively.

           zero-offset sample to stack the coherent reflec-  for α, R N ,and R NIP parameters is the main prob-
           tion amplitudes. Fig. 10.27 schematically shows  lem to be solved during a CRS application. An
           the CRS surface, also known as the CRS opera-  objective function is defined to measure the fit
           tor, and its relation to the NMO stacking curve  between the green CRS stacking operator in
           over the common offset sections. Conventional  Fig. 10.27B and the recorded reflection event in
           NMO/stacking for a reflection from a curved  the prestack data, which allows the CRS algo-
           reflector segment is performed along a curve  rithm to determine three parameters automati-
           (the red curve at the top of Fig. 10.27A) through-  cally for each time sample in the zero-offset
           out the common offset arrival times, which   stack section (t 0 , x 0 )in(x m , h, t)space.This isdone
           finally produces a stacked amplitude at zero-  by an automatic search accounting for all possible
           offset point P 0 for h ¼ 0, located at (x 0 , t 0 ). This  dips available in the zero-offset data. The three-
           zero-offset point is represented by a zero-offset  parameter search is achieved by a perturbation
           ray reflected at point NIP on the reflector and  of the parameters, which ultimately changes the
           recorded at point x 0 at the earth’s surface (the  operator shape calculated from Eq. (10.19) at each
           red ray path at the bottom of Fig. 10.27A). There-  perturbation, and by calculating the coherence
           fore, only the amplitudes along the red NMO  along the operator in the multichannel seismic
           curve contribute to the stack for a conventional  data. The optimum values are established by a
           NMO/stack. For the CRS stack, however, all   maximum semblance value associated with that
           the amplitudes along the CRS operator (green  parameter along the calculated stacking surface.
           surface at the top of Fig. 10.27A) contribute to  When the correct parameters are selected during
           the CRS stacking amplitude.                  the search, the amplitudes of any specific reflec-
              Fig. 10.27Bschematically shows the datavol-  tor segment are summed up constructively,
           ume that the CRS operator works on. The seismic  which yields an enhanced coherence value, mak-
           data is represented in half offset (h)-midpoint (x m )  ing the CRS stacking method entirely data driven
           coordinates, and the green surface demonstrates  (Heilmann, 2007).
           the CRS operator. During the CRS stacking pro-  Fig. 10.28 compares conventional NMO/
           cess, determination of optimum stacking values  stack and CRS stack sections for a low fold 2D
   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498