Page 1132 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 1132

∗
                                                ∗
                                         ∗
          excited states corresponding to n →  ,  →  , and n →  have been described, and     1117
                                     y                z
          there are several Rydberg states as well. The atomic populations and bond orders were
          calculated using the AIM method.                                               SECTION 12.3
                                                                                       Photochemistry of
                                                                                     Carbonyl Compounds
                                      Atomic population           Bond order
                              C           O       H           C−O        C–H

          State   E (eV)      Total       Total       Total      Total       Total
                  0.00   0.431  4.833  1.541  9.207  0.014  0.980  0.664  1.43  0.006  0.958
          S 0
          n y →  ∗  4.58  1.025  5.438  1.890  8.821  0.043  0.871  0.094  0.871  0.000  0.886
           →   ∗  9.19   0.521  5.170  1.425  9.063  0.028  0.883  0.171  0.957  0.011  0.867
          n z →  ∗  9.97  1.069  5.467  1.844  8.674  0.043  0.930  0.263  0.797  0.041  0.943



                                            ∗
              According to these results the n →  shows 0.39e and 0.11e lost from O and H,
                                        y
          respectively, whereas C gains 0.61e compared to the ground state. The  →  state
                                                                           ∗
          shows a smaller loss from both O (0.140 e) and from H (0.10). The   bond order in
          all the excited states is decreased by the population of an antibonding   orbital. The
                                                                     ∗
          charge shifts in the   and   systems are in opposite senses, but the overall effect is
          that the O becomes less electron rich and takes on the character of an electrophilic
          radical. The excited states are nonplanar. Some of the computed bond distances and
          angles are shown below. 102
                      1.087        1.090          1.088
                    H            H               H             H  1.076
                        1.207       1.325                          1.462
                  116.6°  C  O  117.4° C       118.9° C  1.495  139.4°C
                                      O              O              O
                    H            H  nonplanar    H  nonplanar  H  nonplanar
                                 n    π ∗       π    π ∗        n     π ∗
                      S 0         y                              z
              The excited states of other saturated carbonyl compounds are similar. Alkyl groups
          somewhat stabilize the excited state and reduce the excitation energy. In acetaldehyde,
          the conformation of the n→  state changes from the H−O eclipsed structure in the
                                   ∗
          ground state (see p. 148) to an H−O staggered conformation. 103
                                           1.106
                                          H
                                          H  C  1.343
                                        H   1.500  O
                                        1.087  H

              For conjugated carbonyl compounds, such as  ,ß-enones, the orbital diagram
          is similar, except that the HOMO of the ground state is   of the enone system,
                                                             2
                                                         ∗
          rather than an oxygen unshared pair orbital. In the  -  state, the C=O and C=C
                                                                    ∗
          bonds lengthen and the C(1)−C(2) bond shortens. 104  Population of the   orbital shifts
          102
             M. Dallos, T. Muller, H. Lischka, and R. Shepard, J. Chem. Phys., 114, 746 (2001).
          103   J. M. Price, J. A. Mack, G. v. Helden, X. Yang, and A. M. Wodtke, J. Phys. Chem., 98, 1791 (1994).
          104
             C. S. Page and M. Olivucci, J. Comput. Chem., 24, 298 (2003).
   1127   1128   1129   1130   1131   1132   1133   1134   1135   1136   1137