Page 349 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 349

330               The effect of the same substituents on the adduct was evaluated by another isodesmic
                       reaction:
     CHAPTER 3
                                      –                        –
     Structural Effects on      XYCHO     +  2   CH 3  H   CH 3 O   +  CH 3  X  +  CH 3  Y
     Stability and Reactivity
                           This analysis permits assignment of hydride affinity to the carbonyl compounds
                       relative to formaldehyde. The stabilization of the carbonyl compound by X relative to
                       H is shown in Table 3.25 as  C=O. The stabilization of the hydride adduct is shown as
                             −
                        CHO . The difference, the hydride affinity relative to CH =O, is listed as  HA. The
                                                                       2
                       resonance donors NH and CH O have the largest stabilizing effect on the carbonyl
                                         2
                                                 3
                       starting material, but F also has a very significant stabilizing effect. The stabilization
                       of the tetrahedral adduct is in the order of bond strength F > CH O > NH > CH . The
                                                                                        3
                                                                                  2
                                                                          3
                       difference between the two values places the overall substituent effect for reactivity
                       toward hydride in the order F > H > CH > OCH > NH , in excellent agreement with
                                                       3       3     2
                       experimental data. The polar EWGs CN and CF strongly favor hydride addition by
                                                               3
                       strong stabilization of the anionic tetrahedral adduct. As a result, they have the largest
                       overall effect on the stability of the hydride adduct, followed by fluoro and formyl.
                           The stability relationships for carbonyl substitution reactions by an anionic nucle-
                       ophile are summarized in Scheme 3.3. The simplest substitution reactions consist of
                       two reversible steps, the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate and the subsequent
                       elimination of the original substituent. As we discuss in Chapter 7, the mechanism
                       is frequently more complex, often involving proton transfers. However, the stability
                       effects of the carbonyl groups can be illustrated in terms of the simple two-step mecha-
                                                                                       −
                       nisms. The stability order of reactants and products is F, Cl < OR < NR < O . The
                                                                                  2
                       order of stability of the anionic tetrahedral intermediates is F > RO > RN > O . The
                                                                                       −
                                                                                   2
                                                                                      −
                       diagram clearly indicates that the reactivity order will be F > RO > R N > O . Note
                                                                                2
                       also that the relative rates for the two possible fates of the tetrahedral intermediate
                                                                                     −
                                                                              −
                       (forward or reverse) are determined by the ease with which either X or Nu departs
                                                                                −
                                                                         −
                                                                   −
                       from the tetrahedral intermediate. This order will be F > RO > NH > O ,sowe
                                                                                     2−
                                                                                2
                       expect substitution on acyl fluorides (and other acyl halides) to be fast and irreversible.
                       On the other hand, nucleophilic substitution on carboxylate anions, which is at the
                       other end of the reactivity range, is nearly impossible. (We will see in Section 7.2.2.2
                       in Part B that organolithium compounds are strong enough nucleophiles to achieve
                       addition with carboxylate groups, at least in the presence of Li .) The relative stability
                                                                         +
                                  Table 3.25. Substituent Effects on Hydride Affinity of
                                  XYC=O by an Isodesmic Reaction Sequence (in kcal/mol by
                                                G2(MP2) Calculations) a
                                  X         Y          C=O         HCO −       HA
                                  H       H             0           0          0
                                  H       CH 3         11 1         9 6        1 5
                                  H       NH 2         31 5        21 8        9 7
                                  H       CH 3 O       32 8        29 0        3 8
                                  H       F            26 1        38 2      −12 1
                                  H       CH=O          3 1        19 0      −15 9
                                  H       CF 3        −3 0         23 3      −26 3
                                  H       CN          −2 4         25 9      −28 3
                                  a. R. E. Rosenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 10358 (1993).
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354