Page 606 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 606

588               6.2. Carbanion Character of Organometallic Compounds

     CHAPTER 6
                           The organometallic derivatives of lithium, magnesium, and other strongly
     Carbanions and Other
     Carbon Nucleophiles  electropositive metals have some of the properties expected for salts of carbanions.
                       Owing to the low acidity of most hydrocarbons, organometallic compounds usually
                       cannot be prepared by proton transfer reactions. Instead, the most general preparative
                       methods start with the corresponding halogen compound.

                                      CH I  +  2Li        CH Li  +  LiI
                                        3
                                                            3
                                      CH (CH ) Br  +  Mg          CH (CH ) MgBr
                                                                        2 3
                                                                    3
                                        3
                                            2 3
                                      PhBr  +  2Li         PhLi  +  LiBr
                       There are other preparative methods, which are considered in Chapter 7 of Part B.
                           Organolithium compounds derived from saturated hydrocarbons are extremely
                       strong bases and react rapidly with any molecule having an −OH, −NH, or −SH group
                       by proton transfer to form the hydrocarbon. Accurate pK values are not known, but
                       range upward from the estimate of ∼50 for methane. The order of basicity CH Li <
                                                                                        3
                       CH  CH   Li < CH   CLi is due to the electron-releasing effect of alkyl substituents
                                        3 3
                          3
                              2 3
                       and is consistent with increasing reactivity in proton abstraction reactions in the order
                       CH Li < CH  CH   Li < CH   CLi. Phenyl- , methyl, n-butyl- , and t-butyllithium
                                  3
                          3
                                                3 3
                                      2 3
                       are all stronger bases than the anions of the hydrocarbons listed in Table 6.2. Unlike
                       proton transfers from oxygen, nitrogen, or sulfur, proton removal from carbon atoms
                       is usually not a fast reaction. Thus, even though t-butyllithium is thermodynamically
                       capable of deprotonating toluene, the reaction is quite slow. In part, the reason is that
                       the organolithium compounds exist as tetramers, hexamers, and higher aggregates in
                       hydrocarbon and ether solvents. 28
                           In solution, organolithium compounds exist as aggregates, with the degree of
                       aggregation depending on the structure of the organic group and the solvent. The
                       nature of the species present in solution can be studied by low-temperature NMR.
                       n-Butyllithium in THF, for example, is present as a tetramer-dimer mixture. 29  The
                       tetrameric species is dominant.
                                     [(BuLi)4·(THF)4]  +  4  THF  2 [(BuLi)2·(THF)4]

                           Tetrameric structures based on distorted cubic structures are also found for
                        CH Li  and  C H Li  4  30  and they can be represented as tetrahedral of lithium ions
                                       5
                              4
                           3
                                     2
                       with each face occupied by a carbanion ligand.
                                                     R   Li  R
                                                     Li     Li
                                                     R   Li R

                        28
                          G. Fraenkel, M. Henrichs, J. M. Hewitt, B. M. Su, and M. J. Geckle, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 3345
                          (1980); G. Fraenkel, M. Henrichs, M. Hewitt, and B. M. Su, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106, 255 (1984).
                        29   D. Seebach, R. Hassig, and J. Gabriel, Helv. Chim. Acta, 66, 308 (1983); J. F. McGarrity and C. A. Ogle,
                          J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 1805 (1984).
                        30
                          E. Weiss and E. A. C. Lucken, J. Organomet. Chem., 2, 197 (1964); E. Weiss and G. Hencken,
                          J. Organomet. Chem., 21, 265 (1970); H. Koester, D. Thoennes, and E. Weiss, J. Organomet. Chem.,
                          160, 1 (1978); H. Dietrich, Acta Crystallogr., 16, 681 (1963); H. Dietrich, J. Organomet. Chem., 205,
                          291 (1981).
   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611