Page 609 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 609

hydrocarbon. This fact, along with the relatively high solubility of simple lithium  591
          compounds in nonpolar solvents, has given rise to the idea that the C–Li bond is largely
          covalent. However, AIM analysis of simple alkyllithium compounds indicates that the  SECTION 6.3
          bonds are largely ionic. The charges on lithium in methyl- and vinyllithium are +0 91e  Carbanions Stabilized by
                                                                                       Functional Groups
                               41
          and +0 92e, respectively. The ionic character is also evident in the structure of allyl-
          lithium. The lithium is centered above the allyl anion, indicating an ionic structure. 42
          The good solubility in nonpolar solvents is perhaps due to the cluster-type structures,
          which place the organic groups on the periphery of the cluster.
              The relative slowness of the abstraction of protons from carbon acids by organo-
          lithium reagents is probably also due to the compact character of the carbon-lithium
          clusters. Since the electrons associated with the carbanion are tightly associated with
          the cluster of lithium cations, some activation energy is required to break the bond
          before the carbanion can act as a base. This kinetic sluggishness of organometallic
          compounds as bases permits important reactions in which the organometallic species
          acts as a nucleophile in preference to functioning as a strong base. The addition
          reactions of organolithium and organomagnesium compounds to carbonyl groups
          in aldehydes, ketones, and esters are important examples. As will be seen in the
          next section, carbonyl compounds are much more acidic than hydrocarbons. Never-
          theless, in most cases, the proton transfer reaction of organometallic reagents is
          slower than nucleophilic attack at the carbonyl group. It is this feature of the
          reactivity of organometallics that permits the very extensive use of organometallic
          compounds in organic synthesis. The reactions of organolithium and organomagnesium
          compounds with carbonyl compounds is discussed in a synthetic context in Chapter 7
          of Part B.



          6.3. Carbanions Stabilized by Functional Groups

              Electron-withdrawing substituents cause very large increases in the acidity of C–H
          bonds. Among the functional groups that exert a strong stabilizing effect on carbanions
          are carbonyl, nitro, sulfonyl, and cyano. Both polar and resonance effects are involved
          in the ability of these functional groups to stabilize the negative charge. Perhaps the
          best basis for comparing these groups is the data on the various substituted methanes.
          Bordwell and co-workers determined the relative acidities of the substituted methanes
          with reference to aromatic hydrocarbon indicators in DMSO. 43  The data are given in
          Table 6.6, which established the ordering NO > C=O > CO R ∼ SO ∼ CN > CONR
                                              2            2     2             2
          for anion stabilization.
              Carbanions derived from carbonyl compounds are often referred to as enolates,a
          name derived from the enol tautomer of carbonyl compounds. The resonance-stabilized
          enolate anion is the conjugate base of both the keto and enol forms of carbonyl
          compounds. The anions of nitro compounds are called nitronates and are also resonance
          stabilized. The stabilization of anions of sulfones is believed to be derived primarily
          from polar and polarization effects.

           41
             J. P. Richie and S. M. Bachrach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 109, 5909 (1987).
           42   T. Clark, C. Rohde, and P. v. R. Schleyer, Organometallics, 2, 1344 (1983).
           43
             F. G. Bordwell and W. S. Matthews, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 96, 1216 (1974); W. S. Matthews, J. E. Bares,
             J. E. Bartmess, F. G. Bordwell, F. J. Cornforth, G. E. Drucker, Z. Margolin, R. J. McCallum,
             G. J. McCollum, and N. R. Vanier, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 7006 (1975).
   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613   614