Page 633 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 633

K +                    C 2 H 5 O  O        O  O                          615
                  O –  O    +  C 2 H 5 X                 +  CH 3
                                  –
                                           CH 3                     OC 2 H 5
                                                                                          SECTION 6.5
                                                   OC 2 H 5
               CH 3                                              C 2 H 5
                      OC 2 H 5
                                                                                         Carbanions as
               Leaving group X  Solvent  C:O ratio  Leaving group X  Solvent  C:O ratio  Nucleophiles in S N 2
                                                                                            Reactions
                              THF       100:0                  HMPA      12:88
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5                    OSO 2 C 7 H 7
                             t -BuOH    100:0     Cl           HMPA      40:60
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
                              EtOH      92:8      Br           HMPA      61:39
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
                             CH 3 CN    68:32     I            HMPA      87:13
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
                              DMSO      30:70
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
                              DMF       21:79
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
                              HMPA      17:83
                OSO 2 OC 2 H 5
          These data show that a change from a hard leaving group (sulfonate, sulfate) to
          a softer leaving group (bromide, iodide) favors carbon alkylation. Another possible
          factor in C:O ratios may be the ability of sulfonates to form a six-membered cyclic
          TS for both modes of reaction, whereas halides can form such structures only for
          C-alkylation. 83
                                             R'    O               O
                         M +                    S             M +     O
                                              O   O                 S
                      –O    X                       +            O
                                              R    M       –O         R'
                            R                   O -              R
                   6-membered TS  available   6-membered TS available
                   only for C-alkylation      for both C-and O-alkylation
          The data for ethyl acetoacetate alkylation also show a shift from C-alkylation in THF
          and alcohols to dominant O-alkylation in DMSO, DMF, and HMPA. This reflects
          the more dissociated and weakly solvated state of the enolate in the aprotic dipolar
          solvents.
              Another major influence on the C:O ratios is presumably the degree of aggre-
          gation. The reactivity at oxygen should be enhanced by dissociation since the
          electron density is less tightly associated with the cation. With the lithium enolate
          of acetophenone, for example, C-alkylation is the major product with methyl iodide
          but C-alkylation and O-alkylation occur to approximately equal extents with dimethyl
          sulfate. The C:O ratio is shifted more to O-alkylation by addition of HMPA or other
          cation-complexing agents. Thus, with four equivalents of HMPA the C:O ratio for
          methyl iodide drops from more than 200:1 to 10:1, whereas with dimethyl sulfate the
          C:O ratio changes from 1.2:1 to 0.2:1 when HMPA is added. 95
              Steric and stereoelectronic effects control the direction of approach of an
          electrophile to the enolate. Electrophiles approach from the side of the enolate that
          is less hindered. Many examples of such effects have been observed. 96  In ketone
          and ester enolates that are exocyclic to a conformationally biased cyclohexane ring
          there is a small preference for the electrophile to approach from the equatorial
           95   L. M. Jackman and B. C. Lange, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 4494 (1981).
           96
             Reviews: D. A. Evans, in Asymmetric Synthesis, Vol. 3, J. D. Morrison, ed., Academic Press, New York,
             1984, Chap. 1; D. Caine, in Carbon-Carbon Bond Formation, R. L. Augustine, ed., Marcel Dekker,
             New York, 1979.
   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638