Page 689 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 689

Mechanism I. 68  Mechanism III cannot be distinguished from the first two on the    671
          basis of kinetics alone, because the reactive species shown is in rapid equilibrium
          with the anion and therefore equivalent to it in terms of reaction kinetics. The  SECTION 7.5
          general acid catalysis of Mechanism III can be eliminated on the basis of failure  Intramolecular Catalysis
                                                                                    of Carbonyl Substitution
          of other nucleophiles to show evidence for general acid catalysis by the neigh-   Reactions
          boring carboxylic acid group. Since there is no reason to believe hydroxide should
          be special in this way, Mechanism III is ruled out. Thus Mechanism II, general base
          catalysis of water attack, is believed to be the correct description of the hydrolysis of
          aspirin.
              The extent to which intramolecular nucleophilic catalysis of the type depicted in
          Mechanism I is important is a function of the leaving ability of the alkoxy group. This
          has been demonstrated by the study of the hydrolysis of a series of monoesters of
          phthalic acid.
                             CO 2 –                   CO 2 –
                                   +  – OH                  +  ROH
                             CO R                     CO 2 –
                                2
          Nucleophilic participation is important only for esters of alcohols that have pK < 13.
                                                                          a
          Specifically, phenyl and trifluoroethyl esters exhibit nucleophilic catalysis, but
          methyl and 2-chloroethyl esters do not. 69  This result reflects the fate of the tetra-
          hedral intermediate that results from nucleophilic participation. For relatively acidic
          alcohols, the alkoxide group can be eliminated, leading to hydrolysis via nucleophilic
          catalysis.
                                                     O               O
                  CO H             CO 2 –
                    2
                                                    O                 O  +  – OR
                     R             CO R
                  CO 2               2               O –
                                                 RO                  O
          For less acidic alcohols, nucleophilic participation is ineffective because of the low
          tendency of such alcohols to function as leaving groups. The tetrahedral intermediate
          formed by intramolecular addition simply returns to starting material because the
          carboxylate is a much better leaving group than the alkoxide. A similar observation
          is made for salicylate esters. In contrast to aspirin itself, acetyl salicylates with EWG
          groups (o- and p-nitro analogs) hydrolyze via the nucleophilic catalysis mechanism
          in which the phenolates act as leaving groups from the cyclic intermediate. 70  The
          difference, in comparison with aspirin, is the improved leaving group capacity of the
          phenolate.

            O 2 N  O 2 CCH 3 O 2 N  O –   O 2 N   O –                     +
                                 O                            O 2 N   O –
                                                           H 2 O
                                     CH 3           O  CH 3             CH 3 CO 2 H
                      –            O
                    CO 2                                              CO 2 H
                                                  O   O
                                 O             NO 2
                NO 2                                               NO 2
                              NO 2
              Intramolecular catalysis of ester hydrolysis by nitrogen nucleophiles is also
          important. The role of imidazole rings in intramolecular catalysis has received partic-
          ularly close scrutiny. There are two reasons for this. One is that the imidazole ring of
           68   A. R. Fersht and A. J. Kirby, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 4857 (1967).
           69   J. W. Thanassi and T. C. Bruice, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 747 (1966).
           70
             A. R. Fersht and A. J. Kirby, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 89, 5960 (1967); J. Am. Chem. Soc., 90, 5818 (1968).
   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694