Page 812 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 812

the LUMO and HOMO, 
 =         −      	/2. 34  Thus the harder a reactant ring      795
                                     LUMO   HOMO
          system is, the more difficult it is for an electrophile to complete  -bond formation.
                                                                                          SECTION 9.3
                                       E +           E +                            Reactivity of Polycyclic
                                                                                      and Heteroaromatic
                                                                                           Compounds


                                   more difficult  less difficult
                                   larger E a   smaller E a


          This idea can be quantitatively expressed by defining activation hardness as the
                                                                             35
          difference in the LUMO-HOMO gap for the reactant and the cationic intermediate :
                            ∗
                          
 =      R LUMO  −  R HOMO 	−     LUMO  −    HOMO 	 /2

                 R
          where   and   are the orbitals of the reactant and cationic intermediate.
              Simple HMO theory has been used to calculate  
 for several benzenoid hydro-
                                                       ∗
          carbons, substituted benzenes, and heterocycles. The resulting values are in qualitative
          agreement with reactivity trends. Scheme 9.3 gives some of the data. The less positive
          the number, the more reactive the position. Although there are some discrepancies
          between structural groups, within groups the  
 values correlate well with position
                                                  ∗
          selectivity. The most glaring discrepancy is the smaller activation hardness for deacti-
          vated compared with activated benzenes. In particular, benzaldehyde and benzoic acid
                 ∗
          have  
 values that are lower than that of benzene, which is counter to their relative
          reactivity. However, the preference for meta substitution of the deactivated benzenes
          is predicted correctly. The deactivation of pyridine, relative to benzene, is also not
                           ∗
          indicated by the  
 value.

             Scheme 9.3. Activation Hardness for Aromatic and Heteroaromatic Compounds a

          Hydrocarbons                             Heteroaromatics
           0.50       0.118          –0.86  0.090  0.411          0.310     0.279
                          0.255              0.139      0.310
                                                                            0.147
                                                                  0.203
                                                        0.440   N        O
                                                    N
                                                               H
                  increasing reactivity                   increasing reactivity
          Activated substituted benzenes           Deactivated substituted benzenes
            F         OH          NH 2              CO H         CHO
                                                       2
               0.462     0.421       0.391             0.322        0.269
               0.492     0.486       0.484             0.222        0.139
           0.435     0.363       0.307             0.325        0.276
          a. Z. Zhou and R. G. Parr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 5720 (1990).




           34   R. G. Pearson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 8440 (1986).
           35
             Z. Zhou and R. G. Parr, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 5720 (1990).
   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817