Page 863 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 863

X:   C          X:                                    847
                                    3.0            Z
              1.5            C                      2.5     C     Z      :X
                  1.0    1.0      Z                                    2.3               SECTION 10.2
                              0.0        0.5              0.7
                                               –0.5             –0.3               The Diels-Alder Reaction
                                             C         X:
                             C         X:  –8.2   Z         C      Z     :X
                  –9.1   –9.1      –9.0            –8.5  –8.5          –8.7
                  –9.1
            –10.5                 Z            –9.5             –9.3
                             –10.9
             Unsubstituted system  Substituted Dienophiles  1-Substituted Dienes  2-Substituted Dienes
            Fig. 10.5. Coefficients and relative energies of dienophile and diene frontier MOs. Orbital energies
            are given in eV. The sizes of the circles give a relative indication of the orbital coefficient. Z stands
            for a conjugated EWG, e.g., C=O, C≡N. NO 2 ; C is a conjugated substituent without strong electronic
            effect, e.g., phenyl, vinyl; X is a conjugated ERG, e.g., OCH 3 ,NH 2 . From J. Am. Chem. Soc., 95,
            4092 (1973).


              From these ideas, we see that for substituted dienes and dienophiles there is
          charge transfer in the process of formation of the TS. The more electron-rich reactant
          acts as an electron donor (nucleophilic) and the more electron-poor reactant accepts
          electron density (electrophilic). It also seems from the data in Tables 10.1 and 10.2
          that reactions are faster, the greater the extent of charge transfer. The reactivity of
          cyclopentadiene increases with the electron-acceptor capacity of the dienophile. Note
          also that the very strongly electrophilic dienophile, tetracyanoethene, is more sensitive
          to substituent effects in the diene than the more moderately electrophilic dienophile,
          maleic anhydride. These relationships can be understood in terms of FMO theory by
          noting that the electrophile LUMO and nucleophile HOMO are closer in energy the
          stronger the substituent effect, as illustrated schematically in Figure 10.6.
              The FMO considerations are most reliable when one component is clearly more
          electrophilic and the other more nucleophilic. When a diene with a 2-EWG substituent




                        1.5
                                                         1.0

                                             HOMO – LUMO gap narrows
                                             as the substituent effect increases



                                                          – 9.1
                      –10.5

                     unsubstituted                     unsubstituted
                     dienophile      EWG      ERG      diene
                               increasing        increasing
                               electrophilicity  nucleophilicity

                     Fig. 10.6. Schematic diagram illustrating substituent effect on reactivity
                     in terms of FMO theory. HOMO-LUMO gap narrows, transition state is
                     stabilized, and reactivity is increased in normal electron-demand Diels-
                     Alder reaction as the nucleophilicity of diene and the electrophilicity of
                     dienophile increase.
   858   859   860   861   862   863   864   865   866   867   868