Page 114 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 114

86               typical photoelectron acceptor, triphenylpyrylium cation, gives an excellent yield of
                       the addition product.
      CHAPTER 2
      Reactions of Carbon                     OTMS          CH O    O
                                                              3
      Nucleophiles with                               hv
      Carbonyl Compounds                                     Ph
                              PhCH(OMe) +              Ph
                                       2
                                                                   94% yield, 66:34 syn:anti
                                                   Ph  O +  Ph
                                                                                       Ref. 73
                       These reactions may operate by providing a source of trimethylsilyl cations, which
                       serve as the active catalyst by a cycle similar to that for Lewis acids.
                           The Mukaiyama aldol reaction can provide access to a variety of  -hydroxy
                       carbonyl compounds and use of acetals as reactants can provide  -alkoxy derivatives.
                       The issues of stereoselectivity are the same as those in the aldol addition reaction, but
                       the tendency toward acyclic rather than cyclic TSs reduces the influence of the E-or
                       Z-configuration of the enolate equivalent on the stereoselectivity.
                           Scheme 2.2 illustrates several examples of the Mukaiyama aldol reaction. Entries
                       1 to 3 are cases of addition reactions with silyl enol ethers as the nucleophile and TiCl  4
                       as the Lewis acid. Entry 2 demonstrates steric approach control with respect to the
                       silyl enol ether, but in this case the relative configuration of the hydroxy group was
                       not assigned. Entry 4 shows a fully substituted silyl enol ether. The favored product
                       places the larger C(2) substituent syn to the hydroxy group. Entry 5 uses a silyl ketene
                       thioacetal. This reaction proceeds through an open TS and favors the anti product.
                           Entries 6 to 9 involve reactions conducted under catalytic conditions. Entry 6 uses
                       an yttrium catalyst that is active in aqueous solution. Entries 7 and 8 are examples of the
                       use of  Cp  Ti O SCF   as a Lewis acid. Entry 9 illustrates the TMS triflate-MABR
                                2    3    3 2
                       catalytic combination.
                           Entries 10 to 14 show reactions involving acetals. Interestingly, Entry 10 shows
                       much-reduced stereoselectivity compared to the corresponding reaction of the aldehyde
                       (The BF -catalyzed reaction of the aldehyde is reported to be 24:1 in favor of the
                              3
                       anti product; ref. 80, p. 91). There are no stereochemical issues in Entries 11 or 12.
                       Entry 13, involving two cyclic reactants, gave a 2:1 mixture of stereoisomers. Entry 14 is
                       a step in a synthesis directed toward the taxane group of diterpenes. Four stereoisomeric
                       products were produced, including the Z:E isomers at the new enone double bond.


                       2.1.5. Control of Facial Selectivity in Aldol and Mukaiyama Aldol Reactions
                           In the discussion of the stereochemistry of aldol and Mukaiyama reactions,
                       the most important factors in determining the syn or anti diastereoselectivity were
                       identified as the nature of the TS (cyclic, open, or chelated) and the configuration
                       (E or Z  of the enolate. If either the aldehyde or enolate is chiral, an additional factor
                       enters the picture. The aldehyde or enolate then has two nonidentical faces and the
                       stereochemical outcome will depend on facial selectivity. In principle, this applies to
                       any stereocenter in the molecule, but the strongest and most studied effects are those
                       of  - and  -substituents. If the aldehyde is chiral, particularly when the stereogenic
                       center is adjacent to the carbonyl group, the competition between the two diastereotopic
                       faces of the carbonyl group determines the stereochemical outcome of the reaction.
                       73
                         M. Kamata, S. Nagai, M. Kato, and E. Hasegawa, Tetrahedron Lett., 37, 7779 (1996).
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119