Page 433 -
P. 433

ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY (EOQ) MODEL  413


                                         The advantage of the trial-and-error approach is that it is rather easy to do and
                                      provides the total annual cost for a number of possible order quantity decisions. In
                                      this case, the minimum cost order quantity appears to be approximately 2000 cases.
                                      The disadvantage of this approach, however, is that it does not provide the exact
                                      minimum cost order quantity.
                                         Refer to Figure 10.3. The minimum total cost order quantity is denoted by an
                                      order size of Q*. By using differential calculus, it can be shown (see Appendix 10.1)
                      The EOQ formula  that the value of Q* that minimizes the total annual cost is given by the formula:
                      determines the optimal
                      order quantity by                                  s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                      balancing the annual

                      holding cost and the                           Q ¼   2DC o                       (10:5)
                      annual ordering cost.                                 C h

                      In 1915 F.W. Harris  This formula is referred to as the economic order quantity (EOQ) formula and can be
                      derived the mathematical  applied to any combination of D, C h and C o .
                      formula for the economic  Using equation (10.5), the minimum total annual cost order quantity for Cape
                      order quantity. It was the
                      first application of  Cola is:
                      quantitative methods to                    r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                      the area of inventory                       2ð104; 000Þ32
                      management.                           Q ¼        2      ¼ 1824 cases
                      Problem 2 at the end of  The use of an order quantity of 1824 in Equation (10.4) shows that the minimum
                      the chapter asks you to  cost inventory policy for Cape Cola has a total annual cost of E3649. Note that
                      show that equal holding  Q* ¼ 1824 balances the holding and ordering costs. Check for yourself to see that
                      and ordering costs is a            2
                      property of the EOQ  these costs are equal.
                      model.
                                      The When-to-Order Decision
                                      Now that we know how much to order, we want to address the question of when to
                                      order. To answer this question, we need to introduce the concept of inventory
                                      position. The inventory position is defined as the amount of inventory on hand plus
                                      the amount of inventory on order. The when-to-order decision is expressed in terms
                      The reorder point is  of a reorder point – the inventory position at which a new order should be placed.
                      expressed in terms of  The manufacturer of Cape Cola guarantees a two-day delivery on any order
                      inventory position, the
                      amount of inventory on  placed by CBC. If we assume that CBC operates 250 days per year, the annual
                      hand plus the amount on  demand of 104 000 cases implies a daily demand of 104 000/250 ¼ 416 cases. So, we
                      order. Some people think  expect (two days)(416 cases per day) ¼ 832 cases of Cape Cola to be sold during the
                      that the reorder point is  two days it takes a new order to reach the CBC warehouse. In inventory terminol-
                      expressed in terms of
                      inventory on hand. With  ogy, the two-day delivery period is referred to as the lead time for a new order, and
                      short lead times,  the 832-case demand anticipated during this period is referred to as the lead-time
                      inventory position is  demand. So CBC should order a new shipment of Cape Cola from the manufacturer
                      usually the same as the  when the inventory reaches 832 cases. For inventory systems using the constant
                      inventory on hand.
                      However, with long lead  demand rate assumption and a fixed lead time, the reorder point is the same as the
                      times, inventory position  lead-time demand. For these systems, the general expression for the reorder point is
                      may be larger than  as follows:
                      inventory on hand.

                                                                        r ¼ dm                         (10:6)





                                      2
                                       Actually, Q* from equation (10.5) is 1824.28, but because we cannot order fractional cases of cola, a Q* of 1824
                                       is shown. This value of Q* may cause a few cents deviation between the two costs. If Q* is used at its exact value,
                                       the holding and ordering costs will be exactly the same.



                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438