Page 513 -
P. 513

RISK ANALYSIS  493


                                         In risk analysis we are concerned with both the probability of a loss and the
                                      magnitude of a loss. Although the base-case scenario looks appealing, PortaCom
                                      might be interested in what happens if the estimates of the direct labour cost per
                                      unit, parts cost per unit and first-year demand do not turn out to be as expected
                                      under the base-case scenario. For instance, suppose that PortaCom believes that
                                      direct labour costs could range from E43 to E47 per unit, parts cost could range
                                      from E80 to E100 per unit and first-year demand could range from 1500 to 28 500
                                      units. Using these ranges, what-if analysis can be used to evaluate a worst-case
                                      scenario and a best-case scenario.
                                         The worst-case value for the direct labour cost is E47 (the highest value), the
                                      worst-case value for the parts cost is E100 (the highest value) and the worst-case
                                      value for demand is 1500 units (the lowest value). Thus, in the worst-case scenario,
                                      c 1 ¼47, c 2 ¼100 and x¼1500. Substituting these values into equation (12.1) leads to
                                      the following profit projection:

                                                    Profit ¼ð249   47   100Þð1500Þ  1 000 000 ¼ 847 000
                                       So, the worst-case scenario leads to a projected loss of E847 000.
                                         The best-case value for the direct labour cost is E43 (the lowest value), the best-
                                      case value for the parts cost is E80 (the lowest value) and the best-case value for
                                      demand is 28 500 units (the highest value). Substituting these values into equation
                                      (12.1) leads to the following profit projection:
                                                    Profit ¼ð249   43   80Þð28 500Þ  1 000 000 ¼ 2 591 000

                      Problem 2 will give you  So, the best-case scenario leads to a projected profit of E2 591 000.
                      practise using what-if  At this point the what-if analysis provides the conclusion that profits could range
                      analysis.
                                      from a loss of E847 000 to a profit of E2 591 000 with a base-case scenario value of
                                      E710 000. Although the base-case profit of E710 000 is possible, the what-if analysis
                                      indicates that either a substantial loss or a substantial profit is also possible. Other
                                      scenarios that PortaCom might want to consider can also be evaluated. However, the
                                      difficulty with what-if analysis is that it does not indicate the likelihood of the various
                                      profit or loss values. In particular, we do not know anything about the probability of a
                                      loss.


                                      Simulation
                                      Using simulation to perform risk analysis for the PortaCom problem is like playing
                                      out many what-if scenarios by randomly generating values for the probabilistic
                                      inputs. The advantage of simulation is that it allows us to assess the probability of
                                      a profit and the probability of a loss.
                                         Using the what-if approach to risk analysis, we selected values for direct labour
                                      cost per unit (c 1 ), parts cost per unit (c 2 ) and first-year demand (x), and then
                                      calculated the resulting profit. Applying simulation to the PortaCom problem
                                      requires generating values for these variables that are representative of what we
                                      might observe in practice. To generate such values, we must know the probability
                                      distribution for each variable. Let’s assume that further analysis by PortaCom led to
                                      the following probability distributions for the direct labour cost per unit, the parts
                                      cost per unit and first-year demand:

                      One advantage of  Direct Labour Cost PortaCom believes that the direct labour cost will range from
                      simulation is the ability to  E43 to E47 per unit and is described by the discrete probability distribution shown in
                      use probability  Table 12.1. Thus, we see a 0.1 probability that the direct labour cost will be E43 per
                      distributions that are
                      unique to the system  unit, a 0.2 probability that the direct labour cost will be E44 per unit and so on. The
                      being studied.  highest probability of 0.4 is associated with a direct labour cost of E45 per unit.




                Copyright 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s). Editorial review has
                      deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518