Page 180 - Analog and Digital Filter Design
P. 180

Bandpass Filters  1 77





                       The capacitor and inductor values given are for a normalized  1 R load. Denor-
                       malization of  the bandpass model for higher load impedance requires compo-
                       nent values to be scaled to have higher impedance. This is done in exactly thc
                       same way  that lowpass or highpass filters are scaled. Inductor values increase
                       in proportion to the load impedance and capacitor values reduce in inverse pro-
                       portion to the load. Capacitor values reduce because their impedance is inversely
                       proportional  to their capacitance values. As  the  load impedance increases, all
                       the reactances in the circuit must increase in order to have the same response as
                       the model.

                       The filter you have been designing is intended to provide a filter for a simple
                       radio receiver, to pick up a carrier at  198 kHz. This requires a 5051 source and
                       load  impedance,  to match  the  radio  frequency  components  at  its  input  and
                       output (50R is the standard impedance for RFcircuits; 75R is standard for tel-
                       evision picture transmission). Impedance scaling is achieved by multiplying the
                       inductor values by 50 and dividing the capacitor by 50. Finally, the filter circuit
                       given in  Figure 6.5 is obtained.















                           C1=289.3nF            C3=936.2nF           C5=289.3nF
                                L1=2.2335u  H        L3=690.14nH          L5=2.2335uH

                 Figure 6.5
                 Bandpass Filter, Denormalized with 50R Load Resistance


                       This circuit is one of  two possible configurations. This configuration was devel-
                       oped from the minimum inductor prototype and had two series resonant arms.
                       Three parallel resonant shunt arms were connected. to the common rail at one
                       end and  to either the source, the load. or the central  node at their  other end.
                       This design gives low impedance outside the passband  because the shunt arms
                       have low impedance at DC and at frequencies above resonance.

                       If  the design were.  instead. developed from the minimum capacitor prototype.
                       the end result would  have used the same number of  capacitors  and  inductors.
                       The difference would have been that the filter would have had three series reso-
                       nant  arms  between  the  source  and  load.  Also.  there  would  have  been  two
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185