Page 304 - Applied statistics and probability for engineers
P. 304

282     Chapter 8/Statistical intervals for a single sample


               8-15.   A civil engineer is analyzing the compressive  15.2  14.2  14.0   12.2   14.4    12.5
               strength of concrete. Compressive strength is normally distrib-  14.3  14.2  13.5  11.8  15.2
                                 2
                       2
               uted with σ = 1000(psi) . A random sample of 12 specimens
               has a mean compressive strength of x = 3250 psi.   Assume that the standard deviation is known to be σ = 0.5.
               (a) Construct a 95% two-sided conidence interval on mean  (a)  Construct a 99% two-sided conidence interval on the mean
                  compressive strength.                            temperature.
               (b) Construct a 99% two-sided conidence interval on mean  (b) Construct a 95% lower-conidence bound on the mean
                  compressive strength. Compare the width of this coni-  temperature.
                  dence interval with the width of the one found in part (a).  (c)  Suppose that you wanted to be 95% conident that the error
               8-16.     Suppose that in Exercise 8-14 we wanted the error in   in estimating the mean temperature is less than 2 degrees
               estimating the mean life from the two-sided conidence interval to   Celsius. What sample size should be used?
               be ive hours at 95% conidence. What sample size should be used?  (d) Suppose that you wanted the total width of the two-sided
               8-17.     Suppose that in Exercise 8-14 you wanted the total   conidence interval on mean temperature to be 1.5 degrees
               width of the two-sided conidence interval on mean life to be   Celsius at 95% conidence. What sample size should be used?
               six hours at 95% conidence. What sample size should be used?  8-22.  Ishikawa et al. (Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,
               8-18.     Suppose that in Exercise 8-15 it is desired to esti-  2012) studied the adhesion of various bioilms to solid surfaces
               mate the compressive strength with an error that is less than 15   for possible use in environmental technologies. Adhesion assay
               psi at 99% conidence. What sample size is required?  is conducted by measuring absorbance at A . Suppose that for
                                                                                               590
               8-19.     By how much must the sample size n be increased if   the bacterial strain Acinetobacter, ive measurements gave read-
               the length of the CI on μ in Equation 8-5 is to be halved?  ings of 2.69, 5.76, 2.67, 1.62 and 4.12 dyne-cm . Assume that the
                                                                                                 2
               8-20.  If the sample size n  is doubled, by how much is the  standard deviation is known to be 0.66 dyne-cm .
                                                                                                  2
               length of the CI on μ in Equation 8-5 reduced? What happens   (a)  Find a 95% conidence interval for the mean adhesion.
               to the length of the interval if the sample size is increased by a   (b) If the scientists want the conidence interval to be no
               factor of four?                                     wider than 0.55 dyne-cm , how many observations should
                                                                                     2
               8-21.           An article in the Journal of Agricul-  they take?
               tural Science [“The Use of Residual Maximum Likelihood to   8-23.  Dairy cows at large commercial farms often receive
               Model Grain Quality Characteristics of Wheat with Variety,  injections of bST (Bovine Somatotropin), a hormone used to
               Climatic and Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects” (1997, Vol. 128, pp.   spur milk production. Bauman et al. (Journal of Dairy Science,
               135–142)] investigated means of wheat grain crude protein  1989) reported that 12 cows given bST produced an average of
               content (CP) and Hagberg falling number (HFN) surveyed in   28.0 kg/d of milk. Assume that the standard deviation of milk
               the United Kingdom. The analysis used a variety of nitrogen   production is 2.25 kg/d.
               fertilizer applications (kg N/ha), temperature (ºC), and total
               monthly rainfall (mm). The following data below describe  (a) Find  a 99%  conidence interval  for  the  true  mean milk
               temperatures for wheat grown at Harper Adams Agricultural   production.
               College between 1982 and 1993. The temperatures measured   (b)  If the farms want the conidence interval to be no wider than
               in June were obtained as follows:                   ±1.25 kg/d, what level of conidence would they need to use?



               8-2      Confidence Interval on the Mean of a Normal
                        Distribution, Variance Unknown

                                   When we are constructing conidence intervals on the mean μ of a normal population when
                                   σ  is known, we can use the procedure in Section 8-1.1. This CI is also approximately valid
                                    2
                                   (because of the central limit theorem) regardless of whether or not the underlying population
                                   is normal so long as n is reasonably large (n ≥ 40, say). As noted in Section 8-1.5, we can
                                   even handle the case of unknown variance for the large-sample-size situation. However, when
                                                        2
                                   the sample is small and σ  is unknown, we must make an assumption about the form of the
                                   underlying distribution to obtain a valid CI procedure. A reasonable assumption in many cases
                                   is that the underlying distribution is normal.
                                     Many populations encountered in practice are well approximated by the normal distribu-
                                   tion, so this assumption will lead to conidence interval procedures of wide applicability. In
                                   fact, moderate departure from normality will have little effect on validity. When the assump-
                                   tion is unreasonable, an alternative is to use nonparametric statistical procedures that are valid
                                   for any underlying distribution.
   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309