Page 545 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 545

CHAP TER 1 6. 2       Standard sedan (saloon) – baseline load paths

               forces only (windshield, roof, backlight in this case) the  more of Q X1 etc., to be conveyed downward to the
               complementary shear flows q 3 q 4 q 5 will be equal to  underbody (so-called ‘semi-open’ structure).
               this, and hence equal to each other. The shear flow   If the windshield glass is adhesive bonded to the
               around this part of the sideframe is thus constant. This  frame, then the glass will act as a substantial load path (as
               reflects the Bredt–Batho theorem for shear flows in  a shear panel). This will relieve the corner bending
               closed sections subject to torsion, because the passenger  moments on the frame (somewhat) and will make a sig-
               compartment can be thought of as a closed tube running  nificant increase in the shear stiffness of the window
               across the car between the sideframes. For some of the  frame. Cars with bonded screens have shown large tor-
               other panels, such as bulkheads and floor, the edge  sion stiffness increases (up to 60%). Care must be taken,
               forces calculated above are affected by additional ex-  however, to ensure that the load in the glass does not
               ternal moments on the panel (e.g. R TF S F on the front  cause it to break in extreme load cases (e.g. vehicle
               bulkhead). This masks the complementary shear flow  corner bump case, or wheel jacking for puncture). The
               effect in these cases. For example, the couple     vehicle stiffness and member stresses (e.g. corner
               T ¼ R FT S F is introduced into the front bulkhead by  bending moment in window frame) should not degrade
               forces R FT (see Fig. 16.2-12) so that the shear force  to unacceptable values in the event of a smashed
               (and hence the local shear flow along the top and   windshield.
               bottom edges) varies across the panel. Thus, force Q 1 is  Windshields attached with (elastomer) gaskets give
               the net force on the top and bottom of this bulkhead.  a much less significant contribution to the structure, due
                 The equality of complementary shear flows can also be  to the flexibility of the gasket.
               used as a check on the solutions for the forces Q on the  (c) The sideframe consists of two (or sometimes
               structural surfaces that have edge forces only (e.g. roof,  three) rings, bordered by the A-, B- and C- (etc.) pillars.
               windshield). Again, this check cannot be applied directly  The share of the shear load Q 4 carried by each of these
               to structural surfaces (e.g. floor) which are subject to  beams will be in proportion to their relative stiffness and
               extra forces in addition to the edge forces.       hence will depend on their second moments of area, and
                 (b) The ‘shear panel’ load path in the compartment  lengths (see Fig. 16.2-17).
               depends on all SSSs in it carrying shear effectively.  Calculating the share of the load in each pillar and
                 The least effective SSSs in this respect are the ring  hence the bending moments and the stresses in the ring
               frames, including the sideframes and the windshield  frames accurately is complicated, particularly in the
               frame. This type of structural surface achieves its in-  multiple ring case (sideframe), since they are statically
               plane shear stiffness by acting as a ring beam, with local  indeterminate (three redundancies per 2D ring).
               bending of its edge beams about an axis normal to the  The sideframe is subject to overall shear, and since it is
               plane of the frame. As discussed earlier, this leads to high  a (multi-bay) ring beam, its edge members experience
               local bending moments at the corners of the frame (see  ‘contraflexure bending’, giving high joint stresses as
               Fig. 16.2-16). The edge members are said to be in  shown in Fig. 16.2-17.
               ‘contraflexure’ since the bending moment (and hence the  (d) As noted above, the ring frames have high bending
               curvature) changes sign part-way along the member.  moments at their corners. Some pillars are shared by
                 The least effective of these frames is the slender  two adjacent ring frames (e.g. the upper A-pillar is
               upper A-pillar. Thickening the lower A-pillar will cause  shared by the windshield surround and sideframe. See





                                                     Q 1
                                                                                   Q 1



                                           Q 5                             Q
                                                                  Q 5       5
                                                                                         BM



                                                        Q 1                    Q 1




               Fig. 16.2-16 Ring beam.


                    554
   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550