Page 593 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 593

CHAP TER 1 8. 1       Design and material utilization



                                                  Global natural mode (complete vehicle)
                                                                           1st torsion [Hz]
                                                1st bending [Hz]










                                     3er                          3er
                                          5er                          5er
                                               7er                           7er


               Fig. 18.1-9 Progressive improvement in dynamic stiffness with successive generations of BMW vehicles.
               Fig. 18.1-10 for BMW models, the target C t value being  structural unit (vehicle side) has risen by 80 per cent in
               15   K w . To avoid excessive loading of the windscreen  comparison with predecessors. The shift in design re-
               and stone chipping damage resulting from excessive  quirements over the last 25 years is illustrated in Figs.
               surface stresses, the inherent stiffness without glass must  18.1-11 and 18.1-12 together with the configurations
               reach 66 per cent of the final stiffness. Specific design  used for modelling 40 mph offset crash and side impact
               improvements were made in the latest models to key  simulations.
               joints and structural members to increase torsional
               stiffness from 20 000 N m/deg to 28 500 N m/deg. Again
               the progression through successive BMW models is   18.1.4.5 Weight efficiency
               shown in Fig. 18.1-10 with a doubling of previous values.
                                                                  Although a basic design requirement previously, the drive
               18.1.4.4 Crashworthiness                           for lower weight vehicles, in the knowledge that 10 per
                                                                  cent reduction in vehicle mass leads to fuel savings of up
               All vehicle manufacturers are placing continued empha-  to 6–7 per cent has intensified over the last 20 years. In
               sis on occupant passive safety and here FEM simulation  the 1970s and 1980s the initial momentum swung to-
               is of special importance, avoiding the need for expen-  wards aluminium as the industry attempted to confirm
               sive vehicle compliance tests during development. In  the fuel economy figures using the most radical materials
               the case of more recent models referred to above the  solution available at the time. The ECV and ASV
               stiffness and dynamic improvements form an excellent  programmes together with the aluminium structured A8,
               basis for crash optimization, and as requirements are  A2, NSX and Z8 programmes described elsewhere in
               aligned to 40 mph impacts the absorbed energy per  this chapter, have helped confirm more efficient




                                                                    Static torsional stiffness
                                                                    C T  (Nm/deg.)








                                                                 3er
                                                                      5er
                                                                            7er
                                    Applied torque: 3000 Nm  Since E38 (1994) ideal values have been obtained.
                                                         (always without sliding roof and through-load facility)

               Fig. 18.1-10 Progressive improvement in torsional stiffness shown for successive BMW model generations. 6


                    604
   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598