Page 122 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 122

Indicators for sustainability assessment  109


                 $400
                 $200
                  $0
                                                                   Bagasse
                –$200
                                                                   O&M costs
               NPV (mi US$)  –$600                                 Investment
                –$400
                                                                   Interest
                –$800
                                                                   tax)
               –$1.000                                             IRPJ—35% (Brazilian
                                                                   PIS-COFINS—18%
                                                                   (Brazilian tax)
               –$1.200
                                                                   Lobor costs
               –$1.400
               –$1.600
                  –100%      –50%        0%        50%       100%
                              Percentage variation of production costs
              Fig. 4.20 Sensitivity of production and capital costs in the FT case.

                 The sensitivity analysis, shown in Figs. 19 and 20, indicates the behavior
              of NPV for variations in economic parameters (e.g., product sale tariffs, cap-
              ital cost, interest rate, production costs). The higher the slope of the line cor-
              responding to the parameter, the greater its influence on NPV. Therefore
              the combination of economic analysis and sensitivity analysis enables the
              evaluation of the economic viability of the enterprise, also determining
              which products can contribute more significantly to financial viability and
              what costs influence the final economic result the most.


              References
              Ali, A.A., Othman, M.R., Shirai, Y., Hassan, M.A., 2015. Sustainable and integrated palm oil
                 biorefinery concept with value-addition of biomass and zero emission system. J. Clean.
                 Prod. 91, 96–99.
                                    a
              Ambat, I., Srivastava, V., Sillanp€€a, M., 2018. Recent advancement in biodiesel production
                 methodologies using various feedstock: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
                 90, 356–369.
              Araujo, Y.R.V., Gois, M.L., Coelho Junior, L.M., Carvalho, M., 2018. Carbon footprint
                 associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut.
                 Res. 1, 1.
              Basu, P., 2013. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis and Torrefaction—Practical Design and The-
                 ory, second ed. Elsevier, Chennai.
              Bauza ´, J., 2015. Sustainable scaling-up of microalgae into a biorefinery concept. 3rd Euro-
                 pean. Workshop Life Cycle Analysis of Algal based Biofuels & Biomaterials, Brussels.
              Beckwith, P., 2011. Delivering the Renewable Fuels Aspiration: The Role of Biobutanol.
                 Commercialization Strategy and Marketing. Butamax, Dupont. Retrieved from: http://
                 www.butamax.com/portals/0/pdf/fo_lichts_next_generation_biofuels_conference_
                 february_2011.pdf.
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127