Page 223 - Chalcogenide Glasses for Infrared Optics
P. 223

IR Imaging Bundles Made fr om Chalcogenide Glass Fibers       199

                5000  4500  4000  3500  3000  2500   2000          cm –4

          100.00
            %T

                   2.2605; 87.77% T  2.4387; 90.31% T  2.7106; 89.71% T  4.8632; 82.74% T  0.2 dB/m
             80                                                0.1 dB/m

          % Transmission  60                             5.3262; 58.85% T  0.3 dB/m



                                                               0.4 dB/m
             40
                           2.8951; 2.40% T  3.3106; 31.71% T    1.0 dB/m
             20               3.0995; 9.77% T  3.8326; 41.07% T  5.1547; 45.94% T  5.5657; 36.81% T  5.7232; 43.02% T  0.5 dB/m


            0.00
              2.000  2.500  3.000  3.500  4.000  4.500  5.000  5.500  6.000
                                       10-m length
          99/02/17 10:18                        Θ CO laser transmission @ 5.25 µm
          X: 10 scans, 4.0 cm –1
          11 vs 1 m .020 C–2 Fiber S–99–1–3
        FIGURE 8.14  FTIR measurement of internal transmission for 10 m of 500-µm core
        unclad C2 fi ber.



              counted within the 3- to 5-µm band. The calculated internal transmis-
              sion is 37 percent. Assuming a perfect antireflection coating, when it
              is multiplied by the 70 percent active area, we arrive at an overall
              transmission number for a 10-m bundle of 26 percent, one-half of our
              program goal. Severe broadening of impurity absorption with the
              length of the fiber reaching 10 m was an unexpected complication.

              8.4.5  Formation of Bundles on the 10-m Drum
              The 10-m-circumference drum was designed, built, and installed by
              Tom Loretz of CES and Paul Modlin of Advantek Engineering in
              January 1999, the 11th month. A diagram of the system is shown in
              Fig. 8.15. The first thing to notice is the drum is supported by only a
              single post, not two usually used for a drum of this size. One would
              be insufficient if the fibers were to be drawn at speeds approaching
              70 mi/h. Our intended speeds were only a fraction of that, 5 to
              10 m/min. The speed control had to be modified for better control
              around zero speed. The main reason that the drum was built with
              only one support column was so that we could remove complete
              ribbons from the drum for stacking. We were still thinking in our 1-m
              ribbon stacking mode. At this point we had to face the reality that it
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228