Page 303 - Chemical Process Equipment - Selection and Design
P. 303

9.9.  FLUIDIZED BED  DRYERS  267

          EXAMPLE 9.&(contanuedj                                 39
          decremented vabue  of  W,,  assume a value of  T,,  and proceed. The   48
          solution is tabulated.
                                                                 58
                         w     T     T'   @(set)
                       0.035   60   450   0
                       0.0325  73.04  378.2  0.0402              68
                        0.03   75.66  352.2  0.0581              78
                       0.025   77.41  315.3  0.0872              88
                        0.02   77.23  286.7  0.1133              98
                       0.015   76.28  261.3  0.1 396
                        0.01   75.15  236.4  0.1 687            198
                       0.005   74.67  208.4  0.2067
                       0.003   75.55  192.4  0.2317             119
                       0.001   79.00  165.0  0.2841
                                                                128
          When going directly from 0.035 to 0.001,
                                                                139
             T2 = 80.28,
             T; = 144.04,                                       148
              0 = 0.3279 sec.                                   159
          The calculation could be repeated with a smaller air rate in order to   169
          reduce its exit temperature to nearer  220"C, thus improving thermal   178
          efficiency.
             In the vessel with diameter = 0.6 an, the air velocities are   138
                  25.0 m/sec   at 450°C inlet                   198
                   5.15 m/sec  at 165°C outlet
                                                               288
                20.1 m/sec   average.                          219
                                                               228
              The vessel height that will provide the needed residence time is
              H  = U,B  = 20.1(0.2841)  = 5.70 rn.
                                                               239
             Very fine particles with  zero  slip velocity will  have the  same
          holdup  time  as  the  air.  The  coarsest  with  settling  velocity  of
          10 m/sec will have a net forward velocity of
             Us = 20.1 - 10 = 10.1 m/sec,
          which corresponds to a holdup time of
             B = 5.7/10.1= 0.56 sec,
          which is desirable since they dry more slowly.
             After  the  assumption of  a,,  other  quantities  are evaluated in
          the order shown in this program.

             9 8  !  Exanir~ 1 E?  9 . 8 .  Pneuma t:  i c  c12r-f
                 we::'  i n9 dryer
             26  !  Findins  the  exit  solids  te
                 MP  T2  by  trial,  then  all   de^
                 enden t  quant i ? i e5




          9.14(a).  This process is  faster  and  much less labor-intensive than   installed). The relatively large power requirements of  fluidized bed
          tray  drying  and  has  largely  replaced  tray  drying  in  the  pharma-   dryers are  counterbalanced by  their  greater  mechanical simplicity
          ceutical industry which  deals with  small production  rates.  Drying   and lower floor space requirements.
          rates  of  2-10Ib/(hr)(cuft)  are  reported  in  this  table,  with  drying   Air rates in Table 9.15 range from 13 to 793 SCFM/sqft, which
          times of  a fraction of  an hour  to  several hours.  In the continuous   is hardly a guide to the selection of  an air rate for a particular case.
          operations of Table 9.15, the residence times are at most a few minutes.   A gas velocity twice the minimum fluidization velocity may be taken
             Thermal efficiency of  fluidized bed dryers is superior to that of   as  a  safe  prescription.  None  of  the  published  correlations  of
          many  other  types, generally less than  twicle  the  latent  heat  of  the   minimum fluidizing velocity is  of  high  accuracy. The  equation  of
          water evaporated being required as heat input. Power requirements   Leva (Fluidization, McGraw-Hill, New  York,  1959) appears to be
          are a major cost factor. The easily dried materials of  Table 9.15(a)   as good as any of the later ones. It is
          show  evaporation  rates  of  58-103  lb/(hr)(HP  installed)  but  the
          more difficult materials of Table 9.15(d) show only 5-18  lb/(hr) (HP                           (9.20)
   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308