Page 21 - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers
P. 21

6                                                           1.  Introduction






















                         - SUCTION
         Fig.  1.3.  A  typical  airfoil  section  for  hybrid  laminar  flow  control  (HLFC).


         and  cleaning  of the  holes  can  be  accomplished  by  reversing  the  mass  flow  while
         the  aircraft  is  stationary.  Extensive  wind-tunnel  tests  have  been  reported  by
         Pfenninger  [1] who  made  use  of vertical  slot  widths  graded  from  0.008  to  0.003
         inches  depending  on  the  thickness  of  the  boundary-layer  and  a  pitch  which
         varied  from  3 to  0.6  inches  depending  on  the  static  pressure.  Difficulties  were
         experienced  with  the  effective  roughness  created  by  the  edges  of  the  slots,  but
         the  system  was  made  to  operate  satisfactorily  so  that  the  effects  of  the  cross-
         flow  velocity  were  removed  in  that  the  flow  around  the  leading  edge  remained
         laminar.  Again,  stability  (Chapter  8)  and  boundary-layer  (Chapter  7)  theories
         can  be  used  in  the  design  of  the  HLFC  wing,  as  discussed  in  the  following
         subsection.

         1.1.2  Calculations  for  NLF  and  HLFC  Wings

         A  calculation  method  (Chapter  4  of  [1])  based  on  the  solutions  of  the  panel,
         boundary-layer  and  stability  equations  for  three  dimensional  flows  can  be  used
         to  demonstrate  the  effects  of  sweep,  angle  of  attack,  and  suction  on  transition.
         A  wing  with  a  cross  section  of  the  NACA  6-series  laminar  flow  airfoil  family
         developed  in the late thirties  is chosen  for this purpose. Its particular  designation
         is NACA  65-412 where the  first  digit  designates  the  airfoil  series and  the  second
         indicates the extent  of the  favorable  pressure gradient  in tenths  of chord  on  both
         upper  and  lower  surfaces  at  design  condition;  the  third  digit  gives  the  design
         lift  coefficient  and  the  last  two  digits  denote  the  thickness  in  percent  of  the
         chord.  The  camber  line  used  to  generate  this  airfoil  has  the  NACA  designation
         a  =  1.0  which means that  the  additional  loading due to camber  is uniform  along
         the  chord.  It  also  happens  that  the  use  of this  particular  camber  line  results  in
         an  airfoil  which  has  its  design  lift  coefficient  at  zero  angle  of  attack  and  all
         calculations  presented  here  were  performed  at  this  angle  of  attack.  The  results
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26