Page 170 - Computational Modeling in Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics
P. 170

Bioimpedance methods  159


                   Table 5.1 Electrical properties (compiled from Andreuccetti et al., 1997) and penetration depths
                   for anatomical regions at 500 kHz.
                   Region                   σ [S/m]         ε r            δ [m] at 500 kHz

                   Brain (averaged)         0.110           1050           2.147
                   Thorax (averaged)        0.044           3000           3.395
                   Liver                    0.148           2770           1.851
                   Lungs                    0.123           1025           2.030
                   Heart                    0.281           3265           1.343
                   Blood                    0.748           4189           0.823
                   Bone (averaged)          0.006           200            9.193


                      p ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                   j 5  2 1, ρ V is the electric charge density, and the electric flux law, rUD ρ , where
                                                                                    5 v
                   D is the electric flux density and yields the quasi-stationary diffusion model for the
                   EMF
                                              h                  i
                                                                 e
                                           2r σ 1 jωε 0 ε r ÞrV 2 J 5 0;                 ð5:25Þ
                                               ð
                          e
                   where J is the external electric current density, ε 0 is the permittivity of the free space,
                   and ε r is the relative permittivity.
                      The hemodynamic problem Eqs. (5.21) (5.23) was solved first and then the elec-
                   tric field problem (DC and then AC). To attain the periodic pulsatile flow structure,
                   several cardiac cycles were simulated, and the friction coefficient was used to ascertain
                   flow periodicity. The last hemodynamic cycle was used then to calculate the dynamic
                   conductivity of blood Eqs. (5.15) (5.19) and the electric field Eqs. (5.24), (5.25).
                   Quadratic, Lagrange, P1 P2 elements were used to integrate the flow problem,
                   Lagrange linear elements for the electrokinetic problem, and first-order vector ele-
                   ments for the quasi-steady electric field problem.
                      Fig. 5.10 presents the simulation results at the peak flow rate (Dobre, 2012). The
                   aorta is the current path with the highest electric current density, which suggests that
                   the flow dynamics should be echoed by any fluctuation in the electric conductivity of
                   the aortic blood. This process is reflected by the bioimpedance, Z(t).
                      Fig. 5.11 displays experimental results (Woltjer et al., 1997) and the derived bioim-
                   pedance and its time derivative obtained by numerical simulation.
                      The waveforms obtained by numerical simulation have features that fairly resemble with
                   those acquired using experimental setups. The morphology of Z(t)and dZ(t)/dt bear the
                   expected trends, and confirms that the ECM method presents the aorta flow. Several partic-
                   ular cardiovascular moments, outlined and analyzed by Taylor et al. (1998),and evidenced
                   through the numerical simulation here too: X—aortic valve closure; B—start of blood ejec-
                   tion, left ventricle; C—major upward systole deflection; O—diastolic upward deflection,
                   LVET and systolic dZ/dt max .
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175