Page 30 - Crucial Conversations
P. 30

1 2     CRUCIAL CONVERSATIONS


       calls for human interaction are best-in-class in holding the rel­
       evant crucial conversations.

    What's the relationship between success in a key area and crucial
     conversations?  Companies that make impressive improvements
     in key performance areas  (and eventually master them)  are gen­
     erally no different  than others in their efforts  to improve. They
     conduct  the  same  awareness  training,  print  the  same  banners,
     and make the same speeches. They differ in what happens when
     someone does  something wrong.  Rather than waiting for a poli­
     cy to kick in or a leader to take charge, people step up, speak up,
     and thrive. Equally important, if it's a leader who seems to be out
     of line, employees willingly speak up, the problem is solved, and
     the  company moves on.
       So what about you? Is your organization stuck in its progress
     toward some important goal? If so, are there conversations that
     you're either avoiding or botching? And how about the people
    you work with? Are they stepping up  to or walking away from
     crucial  conversations?  Could  you  take  a  big  step  forward  by
     improving how you  deal  with these conversations?


     I m  p rove Yo r   Relationships
                u
     Consider  the  impact  crucial  conversations  can  have  on  your
     relationships.  Could failed  crucial  conversations  lead  to failed
     relationships? As it turns out, when you ask the average person
     what causes couples to break up, he or she usually suggests that
     it's due to differences of opinion. Y o u know, people have differ­
     ent theories about how to manage their finances, spice up their
     love lives, or rear their children. In truth, everyone argues about
     important issues. But not everyone splits up. It's how you argue
     that matters.
       For example, when  Clifford Notarius  and  Howard  Markman
     (two noted marriage scholars)  examined couples in the throes of
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35