Page 93 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 93

76                Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites




















                    Fig. 3.29. Modes of interlaminar crack propagation: (a) Mode I opening mode; (b) Mode I1 sliding shear
                                            mode; (c) Mode I11 tearing mode.

                    delamination  front.  Therefore,  delamination  in  practical  composites  is  almost
                    always a mixed-mode fracture process. It is generally accepted that the interlaminar
                    fracture  toughness  of  a  composite  is  determined  principally  by  the  inherent
                    properties of the matrix material including the failure strain, the ability of plastic
                    deformation  and  fracture  toughness, and  further  that  the  fiber-matrix  interface
                    properties  are  not  the  decisive  factor  in  determining the  interlaminar  fracture
                    toughness.
                      Test methods based on fundamental mechanics concepts have been developed to
                    evaluate  the  interlaminar  fracture  resistance  of  laminate  composites. Extensive
                    research  efforts  have  been  devoted  towards  the  standardization  of  interlaminar
                    fracture tests (IFT). In particular, the American Society for Testing and Materials
                    (ASTM)  task  group  (D30.02.02) and  the  European  Structural  Integrity  Group
                    (ESIS), formerly the European Group on Fracture (EGF), have been studying the
                    IFT for over a decade. A series of round  robin tests have been performed by  the
                    ESIS and the ASTM  task groups on glass fiber and carbon fiber thermoset and
                    thermoplastic  matrices  composites.  These  exercises  are  aimed  at  establishing
                    standardized methods  in  specimen preparation  (e.g.,  thickness  of  specimen and
                    type and thickness of starter crack), testing (e.g., loading rate and distance between
                    supports  in  Mode I1 test)  and data analysis (e.g., correction factors, compliance
                    methods versus area method, which are discussed later) to improve reproducibility
                    of the fracture toughness values. Results from the past exercises have been reported
                    (Davies and  Roulin,  1989; Davies  and  Moore,  1990; Davies  et  al.,  1990, 1992;
                    O’Brien and Martin, 1992, 1993).

                    3.4.2.  Mode I Interlaminar Fracture  Test

                      Historically, most attention has been devoted to mode I delamination growth to
                    assess defects critically,  as  the  first-generation composite systems exhibited  low
                    mode  I  fracture  toughness when  subjected to interlaminar  normal  stresses. The
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98