Page 165 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 165

150

                                                                     a


























                                                                     b

















               Fig. 3. Test samples for fracture toughness measurement. (a) Notched beams according to ASTM E 399. (b)
               Short bars according to ASTM E 1304.


                                   Table 3. Fracture toughness K,, (MPa m”’)
          Beam               ASTM E 399        32             33             33
          Short bar         ASTM E 1304        35             35             36





          where P is the applied load, E the elasticity modulus, B,  Wand a are, respectively, the specimen
          thickness, width and crack size, and  f (a/W) and g(a/W) are non-dimensional functions given in [3].
          The iso-Kcurve is the P-COD  curve [eqn (211 after replacing a from eqn (1)  with KI = KIc.
            Figure 4(b) is also a typical load-COD record obtained from short bar specimens. Crack propa-
          gation is stable and proceeds stepwise until reaching the maximum load. Qualitatively, this is the
          kind of record one should expect for a brittle material with a fracture criterion based on a unique
          value of fracture toughness rather than a &curve.

            2.2.2. Stress intensity factor. The initial surface cracks of the two broken bars were modelled as
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170