Page 164 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 164

149


























                                               Fig. 2. Fracture surface of a broken bar.



                     2.2.  Failure analysis
                       The fact that fracture was triggered by a surface crack, and also the brittle aspect of the fracture
                      surfaces, suggested linear elastic fracture mechanics as the simplest tool to analyze the failures. To
                      this end the fracture toughness of the bars was measured, the stress intensity factors for the surface
                     cracks were computed and all these results were compared with the available information  on the
                      failed bars.

                       2.2.1.  Fracture toughness. Fracture toughness was measured following standards ASTM E 399
                     [I]  and ASTM E 1304 [2], and the two results were almost the same. Standard Single Edge Bend
                      Specimens (SEBS), with  16 mm thickness, were used according to ASTM  E 399,  and short bar
                      specimens, of 19.5 mm thickness, according to ASTM E 1304. Figure 3 shows the geometry of these
                     samples and the position of the bar from which they were extracted; in both samples the crack plane
                     was transversal to the bar axis in order to reproduce the same propagation plane as in the failed
                     bars.
                       Experimental results are shown in Table 3. No more tests were performed in view of the small
                     scattering in the recorded toughness values. The small values (KIc = 33-35  MPa mil2) are indicative
                     of brittle behaviour. Two additional test results-load   vs COD (Crack Opening Displacement)-
                     from each type of sample, corroborate this supposition.
                       Figure 4(a)  is a typical example of the load-COD  records from notched beams. The unloading
                     branch  shows successive failures until the broken sample is split in two halves. This behaviour is
                     characteristic  of a  quasi-stable  brittle  fracture, where energy absorption  is almost constant. To
                     check this hypothesis the iso-K curve-corresponding to K,,  = 35 MPa mi/*-was  drawn on Fig.
                     4(a). It fits extremely well with the unloading branch, adding further support to the use of Linear
                     Elastic Fracture Mechanics. The iso-K curve was computed from the stress intensity factor, KI, and
                     compliance, CODIP, expressions given in Ref. [3], Le.:
                                                    KI  = -f(G)
                                                         4P
                                                        BJW
                     and
                                                    COD    24
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169