Page 122 - Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
P. 122

Axial-flow Turbines: Two-dimensional Theory 103













                            FIG. 4.7. Velocity diagram and Mollier diagram for a 50% reaction turbine stage.

                          through the rotor. The implication is clear from eqn. (4.18); the reaction is negative
                          for the impulse turbine stage when account is taken of the irreversibility.

                          50 per cent reaction stage
                            The combined velocity diagram for this case is symmetrical as can be seen from
                          Figure 4.7, since ˇ 3 D ˛ 2 . Because of the symmetry it is at once obvious that ˇ 2 D
                                               1
                          ˛ 3 , also. Now with R D , eqn. (4.18) implies that the enthalpy drop in the nozzle
                                               2
                          row equals the enthalpy drop in the rotor, or
                                           h 3 .                                          (4.23)
                              h 1  h 2 D h 2
                          Figure 4.7 has been drawn with the same values of c x , U and W, as in Figure 4.5
                          (zero reaction case), to emphasise the difference in flow geometry between the 50%
                          reaction and zero reaction stages.


                          Diffusion within blade rows

                            Any diffusion of the flow through turbine blade rows is particularly undesirable
                          and must, at the design stage, be avoided at all costs. This is because the adverse
                          pressure gradient (arising from the flow diffusion) coupled with large amounts of
                          fluid deflection (usual in turbine blade rows), makes boundary-layer separation more
                          than merely possible, with the result that large scale losses arise. A compressor
                          blade row, on the other hand, is designed to cause the fluid pressure to rise in the
                          direction of flow, i.e. an adverse pressure gradient. The magnitude of this gradient
                          is strictly controlled in a compressor, mainly by having a fairly limited amount of
                          fluid deflection in each blade row.
                            The comparison of the profile losses given in Figure 3.14 is illustrative of the
                          undesirable result of negative “reaction” in a turbine blade row. The use of the term
                          reaction here needs qualifying as it was only defined with respect to a complete stage.
                          From eqn. (4.22a) the ratio R/  can be expressed for a single row of blades if the
                          flow angles are known. The original data provided with Figure 3.14 gives the blade
                          inlet angles for impulse and reaction blades as 45.5 and 18.9 deg respectively. Thus,
                          the flow angles can be found from Figure 3.14 for the range of incidence given, and
                          R/  can be calculated. For the reaction blades R/  decreases as incidence increases
                          going from 0.36 to 0.25 as i changes from 0 to 10 deg. The impulse blades, which it
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127