Page 285 - Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
P. 285

266 Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
                          to favourable design conditions with high values of flow Reynolds number, efficient
                          diffusers and low leakage losses at the blade tips. It is seen that over a limited range
                          of specific speed the best radial-flow turbines match the best axial-flow turbine
                          efficiency, but from  s D 0.03 to 10, no other form of turbine handling compressible
                          fluids can exceed the peak performance capability of the axial turbine.
                            Over the fairly limited range of specific speed .0.3 5  s < 1.0/ that the IFR
                          turbine can produce a high efficiency, but it is difficult to find a decisive performance
                          advantage in favour of either the axial flow turbine or the radial-flow turbine. New
                          methods of fabrication enable the blades of small axial-flow turbines to be cast
                          integrally with the rotor so that both types of turbine can operate at about the same
                          blade tip speed. Wood (1963) compared the relative merits of axial and radial gas
                          turbines at some length. In general, although weight, bulk and diameter are greater
                          for radial than axial turbines, the differences are not so large and mechanical design
                          compatibility can reverse the difference in a complete gas turbine power plant. The
                          NASA nuclear Brayton cycle space power studies were all been made with 90 deg
                          IFR turbines rather than with axial flow turbines.
                            The design problems of a small axial-flow turbine were discussed by Dunham and
                          Panton (1973) who studied the cold performance measurements made on a single-
                          shaft turbine of 13 cm diameter, about the same size as the IFR turbines tested by
                          NASA. Tests had been performed with four different rotors to try and determine the
                          effects of aspect ratio, trailing edge thickness, Reynolds number and tip-clearance.
                          One turbine build achieved a total-to-total efficiency of 90 per cent, about equal to
                          that of the best IFR turbine. However, because of the much higher outlet velocity,
                          the total-to-static efficiency of the axial turbine gave a less satisfactory value (84 per
                          cent) than the IFR type which could be decisive in some applications. They also
                          confirmed that the axial turbine tip-clearance were comparatively large, losing two
                          per cent efficiency for every one per cent increase in clearance. The tests illustrated
                          one major design problem of a small axial turbine which was the extreme thinness
                          of the blade trailing edges needed to achieve the efficiencies stated.


                          Optimum design selection of 90 deg IFR turbines

                            Rohlik (1968) has examined analytically the performance of 90 deg inward flow
                          radial turbines in order to determine optimum design geometry for various appli-
                          cations as characterised by specific speed. His procedure, which extends an earlier
                          treatment of Balje (1981) and Wood (1963) was used to determine the design point
                          losses and corresponding efficiencies for various combinations of nozzle exit flow
                          angle ˛ 2 , rotor diameter ratio D 2 /D 3av and rotor blade entry height to exit diameter
                          ratio, b 2 /D 3av . The losses taken into account in the calculations are those associ-
                          ated with,
                           (i) nozzle blade row boundary layers,
                          (ii) rotor passage boundary layers,
                          (iii) rotor blade tip clearance,
                          (iv) disc windage (on the back surface of the rotor),
                           (v) kinetic energy loss at exit.
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290