Page 392 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 392

SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                   if excited sufficiently so that it crosses the vertical (unstable) equilibrium position, may
                   develop chaotic oscillation, as a result of  ‘hesitation’ as to which of the two potential wells
                   it will next gravitate towards. Conceptually, the same may be achieved if  the excitation
                   is provided via flow-induced flutter.
                     The equation of motion is given by the linear equation (3.70), with k  = r = I7 = U = 0
                   and  a!, 0 # 0, as modified by  (3.74) to account for the end-nozzle, and the presence of
                                                       t)
                   the magnetic forces represented by ~lr(1, + K~v~(I, t). In the experiments, ~1  and ~2
                   are determined by measuring the first buckled natural frequency in the post-buckling state
                   of  the  system,  and  the  location  of  the  statically buckled pipe  end.  The  equations are
                   first discretized by Galerkin’s method and then  studied by  simulation via a fourth-order
                   Runge-Kutta  integration scheme, both for the autonomous and the forced system. Useful
                   experimental data, however, could only be obtained for the forced system; flutter of  the
                   buckled autonomous system could not be  achieved because of  experimental limitations
                   (Tang 1997).
                     Numerical  phase-plane plots  for  an  autonomous  system  similar to  the  experimental
                   one but with zero damping (a! = 0 = 0), discretized to fourth order (N = 4), show (a) a
                    stable limit cycle for u = 3.30, just beyond the flutter threshold, (b) period-4 motion for
                   u = 3.89,  and  (c) chaotic oscillation  for  u = 3.96  and  4.29.  Interestingly, for  a  model
                   with N  = 2, periodic rather than chaotic oscillation is displayed for u = 4.29. For N  = 4
                   it is shown that the dynamics evolves about both potential wells: a small orbit about one
                   of  them, followed by a larger orbit leading to the other one.
                     Additional work on the effect of damping shows that, with  increased damping in the
                   pipe material (a), the chaotic attractor is progressively weakened, so that eventually, for
                   a! - 6( lop2), the oscillation becomes periodic.
                      Typical numerical results for the case of  forced oscillation of  the  system are shown
                    in Figure 5.42 for N  = 2 (cf. the early work in  Section 5.8.1) and a low value of  u. It
                    is shown that with increasing Fo and constant w, there is an alternation of  periodic and
                    chaotic regions, which is  mapped  in  (e) for  varying w. A  similar map  for N  = 1 (not
                    shown) is completely different from that of  Figure 5.42(e), but another for N  = 3 is not
                    too radically different from that for N  = 2, showing the beginnings of convergence.
                      The phase-plane plots of Figure 5.42(a-d)  show clearly that for low f = FoL2/EI the
                    vibration is in the vicinity of the potential we11 in which the system is buckled. For higher
                    f, it is  about both wells, and  the  motion  is  essentially as follows: one or  more  orbits
                    around one of  the potential wells, followed by  a trajectory over to  the  other potential
                    well, and so on.
                      The theoretical (N = 3) thresholds for chaos with forced vibration are reasonably close
                    to the experimental ones for a case with u = 0.35. However, this does not represent the
                    best test for the theory since, at such low u, the main effect of  flow is to contribute some
                    additional damping  vis-&vis  u = 0.  Of  more  interest would  have  been  an  experiment
                    at  u  close to  the  flutter boundary; however,  this  was  precluded by  the  apparatus used
                    (Tang 1997).


                    5.8.3  Pipe with added mass at the free end
                    As discussed in Section 3.6.3, the linear dynamics of a cantilevered pipe conveying fluid
                    is modified in interesting ways by  the addition of a point mass, notably  at the free end.
                    The nonlinear dynamics is equally interesting, as will be seen in what follows.
   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397